中国量刑规范化之十年检讨与展望

发布时间：2018-02-20 05:43

本文关键词： 量刑规范化僵局性问题量刑运行规律模糊裁量　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2015年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国量刑规范化自列为重大司法改革项目后,在期待与质疑中推进了十年。期间经过了从过去"部分法院初步试点-全国法院全面试点-全国法院全面试行"到当前"全国法院全面施行"的发展历程。理性检讨这十年的探索实践,其既取得了将量刑纳入庭审程序、全面提取和适用量刑情节、真正改变"轻量刑"观念等革命性成就,也存在实体规则的设置违背刑法基本原理、理论依据的借鉴存在致命误区、意见规则的适用与法典法律适用相冲突、程序规则的设置不能与实体法对接等僵局性问题。展望未来,量刑规范化的规则设置及其实践运行,需坚守刑法及其法律适用的基本原理和量刑的基本运行规律,变量刑运行中的精确数量化为模糊裁量。
[Abstract]:Since the standardization of sentencing in China has been listed as a major judicial reform project, During the ten years of expectation and challenge, it has gone through the course of development from "preliminary trial of some courts to comprehensive trial of national courts" to "comprehensive implementation of national courts" to the current "comprehensive implementation of the national courts" during the period of "preliminary trial of some courts-comprehensive pilot of national courts". To review the exploration practices of the past ten years, It has not only achieved revolutionary achievements such as bringing sentencing into court procedure, abstracting and applying the circumstances of sentencing in an all-round way, changing the concept of "light sentencing", but also violating the basic principles of criminal law by setting up substantive rules. There are fatal misunderstandings in the reference of the theoretical basis, the application of opinion rules conflicts with the application of the law of the code, the setting of procedural rules cannot connect with substantive law, and other deadlock problems, such as looking forward to the future, the rules of sentencing standardization and its practice operation, are discussed. It is necessary to adhere to the basic principles of criminal law and its application and the basic operating law of sentencing, and to change the precise quantity in the operation of sentencing into fuzzy discretion.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会部级法学研究课题青年项目(CLS(2012)Y37):量刑规范化的优化路径研究中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(201104315):量刑规范化的理论论证与优化路径研究
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】