两起网络诽谤案的刑法分析
发布时间:2018-02-20 06:10
本文关键词: 网络诽谤 诽谤罪 刑法规制 出处:《兰州大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着互联网的兴起与发展,人类社会的信息交换发生的质的飞跃。网络在给人们带来便利的同时,由于网络空间的虚拟性和匿名性,利用互联网实施诽谤的行为也日益增多,这不仅严重侵害了受害人的人格名誉,也妨碍了网络环境的健康有序发展。许多国家都根据这一形势出台了网络诽谤的相关立法,并且在司法实践中也积累了大量的判例,我国网络诽谤案件的发生率也在逐年上升,但是我国诽谤法律规制方面却相对缺失,净化网络环境倡导网络文明已经成为全球网民的共同呼声。因此,对于网络诽谤犯罪的防控就成为了当务之急。防控网络诽谤犯罪,除了要提高网民的素质、加强科学技术手段等措施外,还要从法律上加以规范和正确引导。然而,法律也有其稳定性和滞后性,针对网络诽谤案件的层出不穷,传统刑事法律及相关理论显得捉襟见肘。伴随着网络诽谤的社会危害性不断加剧,刑法作为维护社会秩序最强有力也是最后的防治手段,应该发挥其效力,通过对网络诽谤进行刑法规制来有效打击网络诽谤犯罪行为,保障网络空间的安全与文明健康。文章从两则网络诽谤案出发,从刑法学的视角进行分析,全文分为三个部分:第一部分介绍两则网络诽谤案例,即邱某清诉韦智、韦海丰诽谤案和徐某某诉张某某及某网络公司诽谤案,总结案件的争议焦点,即网络诽谤犯罪责任主体的认定、网络诽谤行为的界定、对情节严重的认定以及对网络诽谤犯罪管辖权的确定问题。第二部分针对案件的焦点进行深入分析,对第一部分提出的四个焦点问题逐一探讨,为本案争议焦点提供充足的理论依据。文章并未止步于此,第三部分是对两则网络诽谤案的分析与思考,对两则网络诽谤案的法院裁判结果进行了分析,同时对司法实践中处理类似案件提出一些粗浅的建议,希望能够对司法实践工作有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the rise and development of the Internet, the information exchange of human society has taken place a qualitative leap. While the network brings convenience to people, because of the virtual and anonymous nature of cyberspace, the use of the Internet to carry out libel behavior is increasing day by day. This not only seriously infringes on the reputation of the victim, but also hinders the healthy and orderly development of the network environment. Many countries have enacted relevant legislation on Internet defamation according to this situation, and have accumulated a large number of precedents in judicial practice. The incidence of online libel cases in China is also increasing year by year, but the legal regulation of libel in China is relatively lacking. Therefore, purifying the network environment to advocate the network civilization has become the common voice of the Internet users all over the world. It is urgent to prevent and control the crime of libel on the Internet. In addition to improving the quality of Internet users and strengthening the means of science and technology, the prevention and control of the crime of libel on the Internet should be regulated and correctly guided by law. Law also has its stability and lag, in view of the network libel cases emerge in endlessly, the traditional criminal law and related theories appear to be overstretched. As the most powerful and the last preventive means to maintain social order, the criminal law should exert its effectiveness and effectively crack down on the crime of network libel by regulating the criminal law of network libel. The article analyzes two online libel cases from the angle of criminal law. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part introduces two online defamation cases, namely Qiu Mengqing v. Wei Zhi, Wei Haifeng libel case and Xu xime v. Zhang xue and a network company libel case, summing up the dispute focus of the case, that is, the identification of the subject responsible for the online libel crime, the definition of the network libel act, The second part analyzes the focus of the case deeply, discusses the four focal points raised in the first part one by one. The third part is the analysis and thinking of two online libel cases, and the analysis of the court judgment results of the two online libel cases. At the same time, some superficial suggestions are put forward to deal with similar cases in judicial practice, hoping to be of benefit to judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 石绪;何雯雯;;浅析网络诽谤中“情节严重”的认定[J];法制与经济(中旬);2014年03期
2 霍俊阁;;网络诽谤罪的客观要件分析[J];湖南警察学院学报;2014年03期
3 梁文彩;;网络诽谤行为的刑法分析[J];兰州教育学院学报;2015年01期
4 赵远;;网络诽谤的刑事责任问题研究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2010年08期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 许浩;网络诽谤行为定罪的实证研究[D];辽宁大学;2011年
2 任宪龙;网络诽谤的管辖权与法律适用问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2008年
3 李丁涛;诽谤罪认定研究[D];西南政法大学;2012年
4 曹扬;范燕琼网络诽谤案研究[D];黑龙江大学;2013年
5 李爱凝;网络言论自由的法律规制研究[D];重庆大学;2014年
,本文编号:1518950
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1518950.html