中立帮助行为的可处罚性研究

发布时间：2018-02-22 08:56

本文关键词： 中立行为中立帮助行为出罪考量入罪考量　出处：《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：中立帮助行为的理论自其肇始就众说纷纭,甚至对该理论的研究—度被认为是无价值的。但是笔者认为伴随社会民众风险意识的变迁和刑法理论的细致深入,中立帮助行为这种非传统型态、助益法益侵害风险的行为势必会在理论界中获得一席之地,并在实践中展示出其蓬勃的活力。既然要对中立帮助行为的可处罚性展开讨论,那么务必先要回答中立帮助行为究竟是何种行为,以及什么性质的行为才具有上升到国家层面处以刑罚的必要性。研究的重点之一在于围绕中立帮助行为法律属性而展开的的层层剥茧式的法理分析,通过与中立行为的概念对比而明晰中立帮助行为的内涵,从而为顺理成章地得出区分标准而打下基础。笔者希望以法益侵害风险的差异程度为角度,对中立帮助行为的可罚标准进行探微,力求理论突破与实践创新,期望能够得出既一个符合刑法法理又在实践中具有操作可能性的中性帮助行为可处罚性判断标准。本文的讨论分为以下三个部分展开。第一部分中笔者通过对经典理论设例的介绍,引出中立帮助行为的争议所在。将那些构筑人们共同生活的日常经验,切换到刑法视角重新进行审视。并结合中国刑法学语境,对中立帮助行为的理论争议和司法实践争议进行透视分析。第二部分从刑事法理角度切入,通过梳理中立行为和中立帮助行为的法律属性,淘洗出清晰、独立的中立行为,然后再以法益侵害程度为切入点,将中立帮助行为与中立行为相剥离,继而正式展开对中立帮助行为的理论讨论。同时,笔者深入解析国内外学者观点、思路,为后面可处罚性分析提供理论支撑和逻辑基础。并且在本部分结尾处对中立帮助行为进行了类型化划分。第三部分结合罪刑法定原则和客观归罪理论,尝试性地对中立帮助行为的出入罪情形展开追问。进而分为一般出罪考量和特殊入罪考量两个层次进行探讨。笔者秉持防止入罪滥觞的谦抑立场,力图就中立帮助行为出入罪的界限研究做出符合我国刑法背景的有益尝试。
[Abstract]:Neutral helping behavior theory since its inception has even no value for the study of Public opinions are divergent., - the theory of degree is considered. But I believe that with the social public awareness of the risks of change and the theory of criminal law deeply, neutral helping behavior this unconventional style, help Rechtsgut risk behavior is bound to get a space for one person in theory in the world, and demonstrate its vigorous vitality in practice. Since we want to help the punishment of neutral behavior is discussed, so be sure to answer exactly what kind of behavior is neutral helping behavior, and the behavior of the nature of what is up to the necessity of national level penalty. One of the key research in legal analysis on the legal attribute of neutral helping behavior and launched the peeling layers of cocoon, by contrast with the concept of neutral behavior and help clear neutral behavior from the connotation. For the distinction between standard and logical basis. The author hopes that the difference degree of infringement of legal interest risk from the angle of neutral help punishable standards of, and strive to theoretical breakthrough and innovation in practice, expect to draw both with a criminal law and in practice has the possibility of neutral behavior can be punished the standard of judgment.
The discussion of this article is divided into the following three parts.
In the first part the author through cases of classical theory, leads to neutral behavior will help controversy. Those who build the daily experience of people living together, switch to re-examine the criminal law and criminal law. According to China context, to help neutral behavior theory and the judicial practice dispute dispute perspective analysis.
The second part from the perspective of criminal jurisprudence, legal attribute and behavior by combing the neutral neutral helping behavior, washing out the clear, independent neutral behavior, then the degree of infringement of legal interest as the starting point, will help the neutral behavior and neutral behavior separation, and formally opened to help neutral behavior theory is discussed. At the same time, the author an in-depth analysis of the domestic and foreign scholars views, ideas, for the following can provide theoretical support and logical analysis based punishment of. And in this part at the end of the type division of the neutral helping behavior.
The third part of the combination of the principle of legality and the objective imputation theory, try to help the behavior of the neutral situation. Then the crime out questions are generally divided into two levels of crime crime special considerations and considerations are discussed. The author grasps to prevent crime origin of the restraining position, make a beneficial attempt to conform to China's criminal law context boundaries it tries to help out the crime of neutral.

【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924

【参考文献】