刑法:“虚拟世界”与“现实社会”的博弈与抉择——从两高“网络诽谤”司法解释说开去

发布时间：2018-02-22 14:08

本文关键词： 公共秩序公共场所信息网络刑法解释　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2015年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：两高"网络诽谤"司法解释颁布以来,引起社会和学界的广泛关注,尤其是其中规定的对"诽谤罪"和"寻衅滋事罪"的解释条款,更是成为议论的核心和焦点。基于"公共场所"的概念和对"利用信息网络"的客观理解,并围绕"虚拟世界"与"现实社会"的博弈,以及对刑罚积极主义与刑罚消极主义的选择,展开了对该司法解释第1-5条的深入讨论。特别提出不应直接将"公共场所"扩大进"网络空间","起哄闹事"与"公共秩序严重混乱"也不应简单地在"信息网络"中进行判断,应仍旧依据我国《刑法》第293条第1款第4项中的"造成公共场所秩序严重混乱"的"现实社会"标准来定罪,该司法解释的出台只是增加了"以信息网络为工具"的手段。在刑法解释问题上,主张"消极主义"的刑法解释观,以利于我国"刑事法治"环境的营造和正确刑法解释方法的培养。
[Abstract]:Since the judicial interpretation of "Internet libel" was promulgated by the two high schools, it has attracted widespread attention from both the society and the academic community, especially its provisions on the interpretation of "libel" and "provocative and troublesome crimes". Based on the concept of "public place" and the objective understanding of "using information network" and the game between "virtual world" and "real society", And the choice of penalty positivism and penalty negativity, An in-depth discussion of articles 1-5 of the judicial interpretation was carried out. In particular, it was proposed that "public places" should not be directly expanded into "cyberspace", "hooting" and "serious confusion of public order" should not simply be judged in "information networks", The conviction should continue on the basis of the "real society" criterion of "causing serious disorder in public places" in Article 293, paragraph 1, item 4, of the Criminal Code of our country. The introduction of the judicial interpretation only increases the means of "using the information network as the tool". On the issue of criminal law interpretation, it advocates the view of "negativism" in the criminal law interpretation. In order to help our country "the criminal law" environment construction and the correct criminal law interpretation method cultivation.
【作者单位】：苏州大学王健法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金后期资助项目(13FFX004):“行政刑法新论”
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】