浅析量刑规范化改革

发布时间：2018-02-23 19:17

本文关键词： 量刑规范化电脑量刑量刑指南量刑程序量刑建议　出处：《广东外语外贸大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国的量刑规范化改革是一项卓有成效、求真务实的改革。它既是对传统审判实践和理论方法的继承和发展，也是对各种方法和实践局限性的克服与超越。量刑规范化改革注重从实体规范和程序规制两个方面进行调整：既注重将定量的方法引入定性分析中并坚持定量分析与定性分析相结合，又通过建立相应的量刑程序保证量刑公正公开的实现。同时，既借鉴国内外成熟的研究成果，，又对其存在的问题进行完善，逐渐形成具有中国特色的量刑规范化改革。本文通过对相关概念的正确解读使读者对量刑规范化有正确深入的理解；通过对量刑改革前后对比进程的阐述，凸显出改革的必要性以及改革成果；通过对国内外各种理论方法的比较，同时对于实践中出现的问题进行对策分析，理论联系实践，寻找出更适合我国量刑规范化改革的出路；通过实体规范与程序规制共同探索勾勒出对我国未来量刑规范化改革的展望。本文的主要行文逻辑在于：我国长期以来形成的重定罪轻量刑观念的弊端逐渐显现，量刑问题逐渐得到人们的重视，尤其是同案异判所造成的社会影响直接推动了量刑规范化改革的序幕。在这场自上而下的改革中，我国比较注重实效和实证研究，在宏观的框架方针下循序渐进、逐步推动。为了有效地实施，首先应该对量刑规范化的相关概念进行阐述解读，对于一直以来存在的误读进行纠正，对于与量刑规范化有关的相关概念进行辨析。紧接着，在对于理论层面的概念阐释清晰之后，就应该针对具体试点中的问题进行有针对性的研究。本文作者通过对最高法院确定的地方试点法院中的典型模式进行研究，从而针对量刑规范化改革中的各种尝试进行逐一分析，其中包括实体上的诸如电脑量刑、《美国联邦量刑指南》以及程序上的构建相对独立的量刑程序。最后，作者对于本文进行总结与展望，对于需要解决的问题提出以有利于量刑规范化改革朝着适合中国国情的方向逐步完善与发展。本文的创新之处在于，以往的研究结果一般只是针对其中一个侧面进行剖析，虽然深入但是并不全面。笔者则是在横向对比各个理论方法和实践经验的基础上纵向分析各个制度以及方法的优缺点，辩证和发展地看待问题以寻找最适合我国量刑规范化改革的发展路径。
[Abstract]:The reform of sentencing standardization in our country is a fruitful and pragmatic reform, which not only inherits and develops the traditional judicial practice and theoretical methods, but also overcomes the limitations of various methods and practices. The reform of sentencing standardization focuses on the adjustment of substantive norms and procedural regulations. It not only emphasizes the introduction of quantitative methods into qualitative analysis, but also insists on the combination of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis. At the same time, by establishing the corresponding sentencing procedures to ensure the realization of sentencing justice and openness. At the same time, we can learn from the mature research results at home and abroad, and perfect the existing problems, and gradually form the standardized reform of sentencing with Chinese characteristics. Through the correct interpretation of relevant concepts, readers have a correct and in-depth understanding of sentencing standardization, through the comparison of the process of sentencing reform before and after the elaboration, highlight the necessity of reform and reform results; Through the comparison of various theories and methods at home and abroad, at the same time, the countermeasures for the problems in practice are analyzed, and the theory is combined with practice to find out a way out that is more suitable for the reform of sentencing standardization in our country. Through the substantive norms and procedural regulations to explore and outline the future reform of sentencing standardization prospects. The main logic of this paper lies in: the malpractice of the concept of emphasizing conviction and light sentencing, which has been formed for a long time in our country, has gradually appeared, and the problem of sentencing has been paid more and more attention by people. In particular, the social impact caused by different judgments in the same case directly promotes the prelude to the standardized reform of sentencing. In this top-down reform, our country pays more attention to practical results and empirical research, and proceeds step by step under the macro-framework policy. Step by step. In order to effectively implement, first of all, we should expound and interpret the relevant concepts of sentencing standardization, correct the misreading that has always existed, and discriminate and analyze related concepts related to the standardization of sentencing. After explaining the concept of the theory level clearly, we should make a targeted study on the problems in the specific pilot projects. The author studies the typical models in the local pilot courts determined by the Supreme Court. Thus, the various attempts in the reform of the standardization of sentencing are analyzed one by one, including, in substance, such as computer sentencing, the United States Federal sentencing Guide, and the construction of relatively independent sentencing procedures in the procedure. Finally, The author summarizes and looks forward to the problems that need to be solved and puts forward that the reform of sentencing standardization should be perfected and developed step by step in a direction suitable for China's national conditions. The innovation of this paper lies in the fact that the previous research results are generally only aimed at one aspect of the analysis. Although deep but not comprehensive, the author analyzes the merits and demerits of various systems and methods on the basis of horizontal comparison of various theoretical methods and practical experiences. Dialectical and developmental view of the problem in order to find the most suitable for China's sentencing standardization reform development path.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.13

【参考文献】