盗窃罪定罪量刑数额标准研究

发布时间：2018-02-24 08:04

本文关键词： 盗窃罪数额定罪量刑标准　出处：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：盗窃罪,伴随着私有制的诞生,是生活中最常见,种类最繁多的犯罪类型之一。从古到今,数额都在盗窃罪的定罪量刑标准上占有很重要的地位,直观且具体。但是现行过于严格且死板的数额标准已经滞后于社会需求,有鉴于此,笔者试图对新中国成立以来的刑法中关于盗窃罪数额规定进行分析,并且提出建议。本文除开导言本文内容分三个部分：第一部分梳理了数额在我国刑法中的现状以及地位,数额对于定罪以及量刑的影响。主要是关于1979年《中华人民共和国刑法》,1997年修订的《中华人民共和国刑法》以及《刑法修正案(八)》对于盗窃罪的规定的之分析,在此基础上总结我国刑法中盗窃罪定罪量刑数额标准的特点。第二部分在我国刑法盗窃罪中定罪量刑数额标准特点的基础上依次分析了数额作为盗窃罪定罪量刑标准的几点不合理性。从对于数额标准的单纯区域性划分的不合理性,熟人之间的盗窃用普通盗窃数额标准的不合理性,以及盗窃罪缺少退赃或补偿损失后关于减免刑罚的标准的不合理性三个方面来分析：第三部分对于现存的不合理性提出了三点建议,一是取消数额的强制性标准,二是确立熟人之间与普通盗窃不同数额标准,非亲属与家庭成员的熟人盗窃中允许被害人参与公诉意见。三是在在积极退赔获得被害人谅解的情形下应规定特别的数额标准。
[Abstract]:Larceny, accompanied by the birth of private ownership, is one of the most common and varied types of crimes in life. From ancient to present, the amount of crime has played an important role in the standard of conviction and sentencing of larceny. In view of the fact that the present standard of amount is too strict and rigid has lagged behind the social demand, the author tries to analyze the provisions of the amount of larceny in the criminal law since the founding of New China, and put forward some suggestions. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into three parts:. The first part combs the current situation and status of the amount in the criminal law of our country. The impact of the amount on conviction and sentencing. It is mainly about the analysis of the provisions of the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China on 1979, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China as amended in 1997, and the Criminal Law Amendment (8) of the Criminal Law on the crime of theft. On this basis, the characteristics of the crime of larceny conviction and sentencing standard in our criminal law are summarized. In the second part, on the basis of the characteristics of the standard of conviction and sentencing in the larceny of criminal law of our country, the author analyzes the irrationality of the amount as the standard of conviction and sentencing of the crime of larceny in turn. The theft between acquaintances is analyzed from three aspects: the irrationality of the standard of ordinary theft amount, and the irrationality of the standard of commutation of penalty after the larceny lacks the return of the stolen goods or compensates for the loss. The third part puts forward three suggestions for the existing irrationality, one is to cancel the mandatory standard of the amount, the other is to establish the different amount standard between acquaintances and ordinary theft. In the theft of acquaintances of non-relatives and family members, the victim is allowed to participate in the public prosecution opinion.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】