“基于合意的他者危险化”与被害人自我答责——兼论中国语境下的归责问题

发布时间：2018-02-26 13:32

  本文关键词： 基于合意 自我答责 客观归责 利益思考 容许风险　出处：《交大法学》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："基于合意的他者危险化"场合中,用被害人自我答责理论直接排除行为人的不法的观点值得商榷。被害人自我答责本身只能是结论而非对该结论的论证,同时,得出被害人自我答责的结论并非当然和排除行为人的不法画上等号,而应当在具体情境下进行个案认定。将传统的客观归责理论与被害人教义学相糅合,以行为的"风险创设—风险实现"为思考主线,以刑法中的利益分析为思考基点,重构出一种综合的归责理论,以此在该场合中分别对行为人和被害人的行为做出评价,并确定归责,是解决问题的合理路径。
[Abstract]:In the case of "danger of the other based on consensus", the view that the theory of victim's self-answer directly precludes the wrongfulness of the actor is debatable. The victim's self-responsibilityitself can only be a conclusion, not a demonstration of the conclusion, at the same time, The conclusion that the victim should answer for himself is not the same sign as the one that excludes the wrongdoer, but should be determined in the specific situation. The traditional objective imputation theory is combined with the dogmatics of the victim. Taking the "risk creation-risk realization" of behavior as the main line of thinking, taking the benefit analysis in criminal law as the starting point, the author reconstructs a comprehensive imputation theory to evaluate the behavior of the actor and the victim respectively in this situation. Ascertaining the imputation is the reasonable way to solve the problem.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D924
，

本文编号：1538226