论悔罪表现在刑事司法中的影响

发布时间：2018-02-27 13:25

本文关键词： 悔罪表现人身危险性刑罚目的刑法谦抑性　出处：《福州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：虽然刑法中未对悔罪表现作明文规定,但却予以了认可并在量刑中加以了运用。悔罪表现能够反映犯罪人的人身危险性程度,并由审判机关在审判实践中根据刑事立法精神、相关刑事政策、社会伦理总结出来的各种主、客观情况。在司法实践中,悔罪表现是大多被忽视的酌定量刑情节,但悔罪表现表明犯罪人人身危险性已经降低,在量刑过程中就应当对悔罪表现作出回应。尽管悔罪表现在体现法官自由裁量权方面的作用不容置疑,但现实司法实践中有关悔罪表现的规定和适用还有诸多问题,对其探讨具有必要性。悔罪表现的明确化和合理适用,有利于发挥悔罪表现在量刑方面的积极作用,同时,也有利于对犯罪人积极改造,更有利于量刑的均衡化、人性化,鼓励犯罪分子回归社会,实现法律的公平、正义。本文着重探讨的是被忽视的酌定情节中的悔罪表现,其中,中止行为、自首行为、坦白行为以及立功行为因被法定化在本文中不加论述。全文除引言外共三部分。第一部分主要阐述了悔罪表现在刑事司法中的适用现状。从司法实践中对悔罪表现认定的不同形式入手,介绍了实践中出现的各种形式,进而分析悔罪表现的立法不足与司法缺陷,指出刑事司法过程中一般不影响定罪的局面状况,同时,指出司法实践中对悔罪表现的不同态度。第二部分着重论述悔罪表现的理论价值。笔者从悔罪表现与人身危险性的关系、悔罪表现与刑罚目的的关系、悔罪表现与刑法谦抑性的关系三方面入手,论证悔罪表现的理论价值,突显出悔罪表现在量刑中平衡刑事处罚的正当性。第三部分对如何实现悔罪表现在刑事司法中的影响力加以论述。基于悔罪表现的重要理论价值,如何实现悔罪表现的影响力就显得至关重要,在本部分针对性地提出了实现悔罪表现司法影响力的解决方案,即将部分悔罪表现法定化,建立有关悔罪表现的案例指导。
[Abstract]:Although there is no explicit provision for the expression of repentance in the criminal law, it is recognized and applied in sentencing. The expression of repentance can reflect the degree of personal dangerousness of the offender, and the trial organ shall act in accordance with the spirit of criminal legislation in the trial practice. In judicial practice, repentance is the most neglected discretionary circumstances of sentencing, but repentance shows that the personal danger of the offender has been reduced. In the process of sentencing, there should be a response to the performance of repentance. Although the role of repentance in embodying the discretion of the judge is indisputable, there are still many problems concerning the regulation and application of the performance of repentance in the actual judicial practice. It is necessary to probe into it. The clear and reasonable application of repentance is helpful to exert the positive effect of repentance in sentencing, at the same time, to reform the criminal actively, and to balance and humanize sentencing. To encourage criminals to return to society, to realize the fairness and justice of the law. This article focuses on the repentance performance in the neglected discretionary scenario, in which the behavior of suspension and surrender is discussed. Confession act and meritorious act are not discussed in this article because they are legalized. There are three parts in the full text except the introduction. The first part mainly expounds the current situation of the application of repentance in criminal justice. Starting with the different forms that have been identified, This paper introduces the various forms in practice, and then analyzes the legislative deficiency and judicial defects of repentance, and points out that the situation of conviction is not affected in the criminal justice process, and at the same time, The author points out the different attitudes towards repentance in judicial practice. The second part focuses on the theoretical value of repentance performance. The author discusses the relationship between repentance performance and personal dangerousness, repentance performance and penalty purpose. Starting with the relationship between repentance performance and the modesty of criminal law, the theoretical value of repentance performance is demonstrated. The third part discusses how to realize the influence of repentance in criminal justice. How to realize the influence of repentance performance is very important. In this part, the author puts forward a solution to realize the judicial influence of repentance performance, that is, legalizing some repentance performance and establishing the case guidance on repentance performance.
【学位授予单位】：福州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924

【相似文献】