章国锡受贿案的法律分析

发布时间：2018-02-27 14:07

本文关键词： 受贿非法证据分析建议　出处：《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文通过对现行法律规定进行分析研究,综合国内外有关非法证据排除规则的各种研究文献,对章国锡案就非法证据排除规则的相关问题予以思考。以“中国非法证据排除第一案”为例,对案例中被告人章国锡受贿的行为进行了法律分析,对本案中涉及的相关法律问题进行阐述,从而对案件中有关非法证据排除进行法律和理论的分析,并依此进行相关的思考,提出相应的建议。具体而言,文章从以下三部分进行构建：第一部分,主要阐述本案的基本案情、争议焦点及引发的相关问题,即本案的犯罪事实、控辩双方的观点及法院的判决结果；如何认定本案中被告人的收受财物的行为；本案被告人的行为能否构成受贿罪以及情节是否严重；我国关于非法证据排除的立法规定是否存在缺陷。第二部分,理论结合案例,分别分析了第一章提及的相关问题：第一节对认定受贿事实证据程序进行了界定,分析并提出了自己的观点,还对被告人的行为进行了定性分析；第二节,对本案具体适用非法证据排除的程序问题进行分析,并对补正解释的证据效力问题进行判断。第三部分,通过对以上问题的分析,提出了解决建议以及对本案引发的思考。
[Abstract]:Through the analysis and study of the existing laws and regulations, this paper synthesizes all kinds of research documents about the exclusion rules of illegal evidence at home and abroad. In the case of Zhang Guoxi, the author thinks about the relevant issues concerning the exclusion rules of illegal evidence. Taking the first case of exclusion of illegal evidence in China as an example, this paper makes a legal analysis of the bribery behavior of the defendant Zhang Guoxi in the case. This paper expounds the relevant legal problems involved in the case, and then analyzes the law and theory of the exclusion of illegal evidence in the case, and puts forward corresponding suggestions according to the relevant thinking. Specifically, the article is constructed from the following three parts:. The first part mainly expounds the basic facts of the case, the focus of the dispute and the related problems, namely, the facts of the crime in this case, the views of both the prosecution and the defence and the court's judgment, how to determine the behavior of the defendant in the case of receiving property; Whether the behavior of the defendant in this case constitutes the crime of accepting bribes and whether the circumstances are serious or not, and whether the legislative provisions on the exclusion of illegal evidence in our country are defective. The second part, combined with the case, analyzes the related problems mentioned in the first chapter: the first section defines the procedure of determining the facts of bribery, analyzes and puts forward its own views, and also carries on qualitative analysis to the defendant's behavior; The second section analyzes the procedure of the exclusion of illegal evidence in this case, and judges the validity of the corrected interpretation. The third part, through the above question analysis, has proposed the solution proposal as well as to this case arouses the ponder.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D920.5;D924.392

【参考文献】