论索债型非法拘禁的刑法规制

发布时间：2018-03-01 09:38

本文关键词： 索债型非法拘禁立法原意刑法规制债务他人　出处：《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国《刑法》第238条第3款规定,索债型非法拘禁构成非法拘禁罪,这是基于特定社会现实和刑事政策考量的结果。该条款虽有利于限制绑架罪的处罚范围,但有些索债型非法拘禁行为在形式和实质上都符合绑架罪的犯罪构成,若对这些行为均以非法拘禁罪论处,则无法为被拘禁人的合法权益提供充分的刑法保护。在司法实践中,由于"债务"关系的复杂性和"他人"范围的模糊性,导致该条款在适用时面临很多困难。通过对非法拘禁罪规范保护目的的分析和该条款立法原意的探寻,建议将"债务"限定为合法债务,将"他人"限定为债务人,以促进该条款在实践中能更好地实现人权保障和法益保护的统一。为弥补现行立法缺陷以及克服当前司法困境,以下两条路径可供选择:一是在司法解释中对"债务"和"他人"作限制性解释;二是在修改刑法时将部分索债型非法拘禁纳入绑架罪的规制范围。
[Abstract]:Article 238, paragraph 3, of the Criminal Law of our country stipulates that the crime of illegal detention constitutes the crime of unlawful detention, which is based on specific social realities and considerations of criminal policy. Although this article is conducive to limiting the scope of punishment for kidnapping, However, some acts of illegal detention for debts are consistent with the crime of kidnapping in both form and substance. If all these acts are treated as crimes of unlawful detention, it will not provide adequate criminal law protection for the legitimate rights and interests of the detained person. Due to the complexity of the relationship between "debt" and the ambiguity of the scope of "others", this article faces many difficulties in its application. It is recommended that the term "debt" be limited to legal debt and that "others" be qualified as debtors, in order to promote the harmonization of human rights safeguards and legal interest protection in practice... in order to remedy the shortcomings of existing legislation and to overcome current judicial dilemmas, The following two paths can be chosen: one is to make restrictive interpretation of "debt" and "others" in judicial interpretation; the other is to bring part of illegal detention for debt into the scope of the crime of kidnapping when amending the criminal law.
【作者单位】：江苏大学;江苏南昆仑律师事务所;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】