万才华妨害作证案法律分析

发布时间：2018-03-01 09:30

本文关键词： 诉讼诈骗行为诉讼诈骗罪想象竞和犯第三人撤销之诉　出处：《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：诉讼诈骗行为一直为学界和司法部门所关注,最高人民检察院法律政策研究室于2002年9月25日作出《关于通过伪造证据骗取法院民事裁判占有他人财物的行为如何适用法律问题的答复》(以下简称《答复》),对司法实务中出现的诉讼诈骗行为的处理作了相关说明。该《答复》在一定程度上缓解了司法实践中的压力,面临诉讼诈骗行为不再是“法无明文规定不为罪”的局面,但由于受现有刑法框架限制,该《答复》并不能穷尽诉讼诈骗行为的表现形式,因此依然无法从根源上杜绝诉讼诈骗行为的滋生和蔓延。本文案例就是《答复》中并未说明但属于典型的诉讼诈骗行为。鉴于此,本文针对诉讼诈骗行为的规制分实然和应然两个层面。本文以万才华妨害作证案为切入点,首先简述具体案情和审理情况,指出本案中的主要争议焦点,进而针对每一对焦点问题提出笔者个人的解决思路。接着以案件的争议焦点为切入点,具体分析本案中万才华的诉讼诈骗行为的定性问题、定罪问题和量刑问题。最后,笔者建议从实然和应然两个层面来规制诉讼诈骗行为。对于司法实务中亟待解决的问题坚持在现有法律体制下采取适当扩大诈骗罪的犯罪构成要件、运用想象竞和犯理论和在刑事诉讼领域增加第三人撤销之诉等措施；对于司法理论完善问题则通过补充诉讼诈骗罪来解决。本文旨在抛砖引玉,对于诉讼诈骗行为的规制问题,希望能给法学界和法律实务界的专家、学者一点启示,为建立诚实、公平、公正的司法秩序提供有益的理论参考。
[Abstract]:Litigation fraud has always been concerned by the academic community and the judiciary. On September 25th 2002, the legal Policy Research Office of the Supreme people's Procuratorate issued an answer to the question of how to apply the law to the act of defrauding a court civil judge of possessing another person's property by falsifying evidence (hereinafter referred to as "the reply"). The handling of litigation fraud in judicial practice has been explained. To a certain extent, the answer has alleviated the pressure in judicial practice. Facing the situation that the action of litigation fraud is no longer a "crime without express provisions of the law", however, due to the limitation of the existing criminal law framework, the answer cannot exhaust the manifestations of the action of fraud in litigation. Therefore, it is still not possible to root out the breeding and spreading of litigation fraud. The case in this paper is a typical litigation fraud that is not explained in the answer. In view of this, This paper aims at the regulation of litigation fraud in two levels: realistic and supposed. In this paper, taking the case of obstructing testimony of all talents as the starting point, first of all, a brief description of the specific case and the trial situation, pointing out the main dispute focus in this case, Then the author puts forward the author's personal solution to each pair of focus issues. Then with the focus of the case as the starting point, the author concretely analyzes the qualitative problem, conviction problem and sentencing problem of the ten thousand talented litigation fraud in this case. The author suggests that the fraud should be regulated from two aspects: real and ought. To solve the urgent problems in the judicial practice, the author insists on the appropriate expansion of the constitutive elements of the crime of fraud under the existing legal system. Using the theory of imaginative competition and crime and increasing the action of the third party in the field of criminal procedure, the perfection of the judicial theory is solved by the supplementary crime of fraud. It is hoped that it will give some enlightenment to the experts and scholars in the field of law and law practice, and provide a useful theoretical reference for the establishment of an honest, fair and just judicial order.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D920.5;D924.36

【参考文献】