盗窃罪之规范诠释

发布时间：2018-03-05 07:23

本文选题：特殊盗窃类型　切入点：行为界定　出处：《北方工业大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：当今社会,随着经济的快速发展,人们的生活质量逐步得到改善,与此同时各种盗窃类型的违法犯罪数量也与日俱增,给人民的生活造成的困扰越来越多,各类盗窃行为所反映出的社会危害性也日渐严重,通过行政处罚进行处理的方式已经无法有效遏制这类犯罪行为的发生。在此形势下,刑法修正案八对盗窃罪及时做出修改,即在传统盗窃罪的基础上,新增了“入户盗窃”、“携带凶器盗窃”和“扒窃”三种行为方式。2013年4月,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院发布了《关于办理盗窃刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》,明确了这三类行为方式的概念,但对于司法实践的具体适用,仍然存有一些问题值得认真研究。本文就在此基础上展开细致思考与分析。笔者将正文主要分为以下四个部分进行阐述：第一部分主要是对盗窃罪特殊行为类型入罪的立法评析。该部分主要结合最新修改的《刑法修正案八》阐述盗窃罪的最新规定,对盗窃罪新增加的几种行为类型的入罪原因从四方面展开分析。第二部分是对盗窃罪侵害的具体法益进行细致分析。在本部分笔者将笔墨重点放在对三种新特殊类型的盗窃罪所侵害的法益的分析上。新增加的几种特殊类型,使得盗窃罪所保护的法益已从单纯的财产权益变成对财产权益和公民人身权利及公共安全的双重保护。第三部分是关于盗窃罪行为类型的界定。该部分是对修改后盗窃罪规定的五种行为类型的展开分析。其中对于修改之前已经存在的“多次盗窃”和“数额较大”两种行为类型进行简要介绍,而将论述重点放在新增加的三种类型的分析上,笔者结合最新出台的司法解释,从语义上对各种类型的盗窃展开细致深入的理解和分析,并对其在司法实践中如何界定和适用进行认真的探究。第四部分是对盗窃罪既遂与未遂的区分。这一部分主要是对特殊类型的盗窃罪的既遂与未遂的标准及区分展开研究。笔者认为这三种特殊类型仍然属于结果犯,仍然应以行为人取得值得刑法保护的财物为既遂标准,如果窃得的财物数额很小或者是没有窃得任何财物,则应以盗窃未遂来认定。
[Abstract]:In today's society, with the rapid development of the economy, the quality of life of people is gradually improved. At the same time, the number of various types of theft is also increasing, causing more and more troubles to the people's lives. The social harmfulness reflected by all kinds of theft acts is becoming more and more serious, and the administrative punishment can no longer effectively curb the occurrence of this kind of criminal behavior. In this situation, the eighth Amendment to the Criminal Law makes timely amendments to the crime of larceny. That is, on the basis of the traditional crime of theft, three new forms of behavior have been added: "burglary", "theft with murder weapons" and "pickpocketing." in April 2013, the Supreme people's Court, The Supreme people's Procuratorate has issued an explanation on some issues applicable to the law in handling criminal cases of theft, which clarifies the concepts of these three types of behavior, but applies specifically to judicial practice. There are still some problems worthy of careful study. On this basis, this paper carries out detailed thinking and analysis. The author divides the text into the following four parts: the first part is mainly about the legislative analysis of the crime of larceny, which is mainly combined with the latest revision of the eighth Amendment of Criminal Law to expound the latest provisions of the crime of larceny. The second part is the detailed analysis of the specific legal benefits of theft infringement. In this part, the author will focus on three new special types of crime in the analysis of the reasons for the crime of larceny of several new types of behavior from four aspects. The second part is a detailed analysis of the specific legal benefits of larceny. In this part, the author focuses on three new special types of crime. On the analysis of the legal benefits infringed by the type of larceny. The law interests protected by larceny have changed from pure property rights and interests to dual protection of property rights and civil rights and public security. The third part is about the definition of the types of larceny. This paper analyzes the five types of behavior stipulated in the crime of larceny after the amendment, including a brief introduction of the two types of behavior, namely, "multiple theft" and "large amount", which already existed before the modification. Focusing on the newly added three types of analysis, the author, combining the latest judicial interpretation, carries out a detailed and in-depth understanding and analysis of various types of theft from the semantic point of view. And how to define and apply it in judicial practice. Part 4th is the distinction between accomplished larceny and attempted larceny. This part is mainly about the standard and differentiation of accomplished and attempted larceny of special type. The author thinks that these three special types still belong to the resultant crime. If the amount of stolen property is small or no property is stolen, it should be determined by attempted theft.
【学位授予单位】：北方工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】