积极一般预防正当性的反思与重塑

发布时间：2018-03-09 16:03

本文选题：积极一般预防　切入点：刑罚正当性　出处：《西南政法大学学报》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：积极一般预防将刑罚的正当性承载于规范意识的唤醒和规范遵循的实现,无法祛除刑罚威慑基础上的认同因子,忠诚恶法的正义悖反,以及将人作为他人犯罪的工具利用,陷入规范违反之现象描述等同犯罪本质、刑罚目之应然义理的刑罚正当性危机之中。溯源刑法惩罚的正当性,刑法规范发端社会共识,公众意志;犯罪本质源自全体公民人权和个人基本人权的不得已权衡。鉴于以往积极一般预防停留现象,作用表面的弊病,以及与消极一般预防同意阐释和反面论证的关系,需要重释积极一般预防的概念内涵,匡正积极一般预防刑罚正当性理论预设,确凿刑法适用标准,以此使积极一般预防名实相符。具体而言,积极一般预防应当以刑法规范遵循公众意愿为核心要义,过滤威慑认同的生发;以保障全体公民人权为刑罚正当性理论预设,避免遵循恶法的偏失;以不得已原则为刑法动用的圭臬,消弭人性尊重与工具利用的矛盾。
[Abstract]:Positive general prevention carries the legitimacy of punishment on the awakening of normative consciousness and the realization of normative compliance, which cannot dispel the identification factor on the basis of penalty deterrence, the justice and opposition of loyalty and draconian law, and the use of human beings as a tool for others to commit crimes. Falling into the crisis of the justification of criminal law which is equivalent to the nature of the crime and the justice of the penalty object, the origin of the criminal law punishment, the social consensus at the beginning of the criminal law norm, and the public will; The essence of the crime derives from the tradeoff between the human rights of all citizens and the fundamental human rights of the individual. In view of the previous positive and general prevention phenomenon, the apparent ills of the role, and the relationship with negative general prevention consent interpretation and negative argument, It is necessary to reinterpret the concept of active general prevention, correct the theoretical presupposition of the legitimacy of active general prevention penalty, and establish the applicable standard of criminal law, so as to make the positive general prevention consistent with the actual situation. The active general prevention should take the criminal law norm as the core meaning, filter the development of the deterrent identity, take the protection of the human rights of all citizens as the theoretical presupposition of the justice of the penalty, and avoid the bias of following the draconian law. The principle of necessity is used in criminal law to eliminate the contradiction between respect for human nature and the use of tools.
【作者单位】：重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家社科基金青年项目“刑法渊源中的立法科学化基本问题研究”(16CFX025)
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】