论非法处置危险废物类污染环境罪中的处置行为

发布时间：2018-03-09 16:25

本文选题：污染环境罪　切入点：保护法益　出处：《法商研究》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：理论和实践中对非法处置危险废物类污染环境罪中处置行为的认定存在分歧,导致了"同案不同判"现象的出现。明确污染环境罪的保护法益对此类罪犯罪构成要件之处置行为认定具有指导意义。污染环境罪是一种包含严重危害可能性的实害犯,其所保护的法益为具有相对独立性的环境本身。严重危害可能性是指对传统法益存在严重危害可能性,对生态环境自身而言则指已经发生环境污染。解读"两高"《关于办理环境污染刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第1条第2项、第5项中的处置行为时,应将实施于企业特定空间范围内的各种处理行为排除在外,否则,将不当扩大污染环境罪的处罚范围,并且有违罪刑法定原则。
[Abstract]:In theory and practice, there are differences in the determination of disposal behavior in the crime of illegal disposal of hazardous wastes, This has led to the appearance of the phenomenon of "different judgments in the same case". It is of guiding significance to determine the disposition of the constitutive elements of such crimes by making clear the benefits of the protection law of the crime of pollution of the environment. The crime of pollution of the environment is a kind of actual crime which contains the possibility of serious harm. The legal interests it protects are the relatively independent environment itself. The possibility of serious harm refers to the possibility of serious harm to traditional legal interests. For the ecological environment itself, it refers to the occurrence of environmental pollution. When interpreting the interpretation of some issues concerning the applicable Law in handling Criminal cases of Environmental pollution in the "two High levels", the disposal act in item 2 and item 5 of Article 1, It is necessary to exclude all kinds of actions which are carried out in the specific space of the enterprise, otherwise, the scope of punishment for the crime of polluting the environment will be expanded improperly, and it will violate the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime against a specified crime.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(15YJC820057)
【分类号】：D924.36

【相似文献】