转化型抢劫罪中“当

发布时间：2018-03-11 01:05

本文选题：转化型抢劫罪　切入点：当场　出处：《湖南师范大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：大陆学界普遍将我国《刑法》第269条的规定称为转化型抢劫罪。由于立法本身所固有的高度抽象性不可能一一对应实践中的具体情形,加之司法主体对法律条文的理解不尽相同,学界和实务界对于此罪的认定存在着比较大的争议,其中对“当场”的认定问题可谓是众说纷纭,莫衷一是。本文的研究目的就是为了厘清“当场”的认定问题,站在学界和实务界的肩膀上,整理前人的研究成果,总结存在问题,并在此基础上进行更全面和清晰的整合,以求完善我国转化型抢劫罪中“当场”的认定。在此过程中,本文运用文献研究法、历史调查法、个案分析法、对比分析法等研究方法,拟就“当场”认定的分歧进行分析探讨。在总结学界相关理论及考察国内外相关规定的基础上,通过对转化型抢劫罪规定的历史沿革追溯,笔者能够较为清晰地展现出当前立法关于“当场”规定存在的问题,即立法解释的缺位和由此造成的司法混乱,并对此问题进行反思。相对应的,笔者认为应该从两个方面进行完善,即立法上要完善解释体系,在司法实践层面的完善上更是要认识到“当场”作为转化型抢劫罪的时空要件,考虑其是空间性概念与时间性概念的结合体,是盗窃、诈骗、抢夺等先行行为与暴力、威胁等后续行为的联结点。这就要特别注意,在司法实践的完善中,应充分从三个方面进行考虑：时空的接续性、先后行为的关联性和追捕事态的继续性。本文的论述,希望对提出立法建议和司法实践的统一、明确有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The stipulation of Article 269 of the Criminal Law of China is generally referred to as the crime of transformational robbery. Because of the high degree of abstraction inherent in the legislation itself, it is impossible to correspond to the specific situation in practice one by one. In addition, the judicial subject's understanding of the legal provisions is not the same, the academic and practical circles of this crime there is a relatively large dispute, among which "on the spot" of the issue of identification is widely held. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the identification of "on the spot", stand on the shoulders of the academic and practical circles, sort out the previous research results, sum up the existing problems, and on this basis carry on a more comprehensive and clear integration. In order to perfect the confirmation of the crime of transforming robbery in our country. In this process, this paper uses literature research, historical investigation, case analysis, comparative analysis and other research methods. On the basis of summing up the relevant theories of academic circles and investigating the relevant provisions at home and abroad, the author traces the historical evolution of the provisions of transformational robbery by means of the analysis and discussion of the differences between the "spot" and "on the spot". The author can clearly show the problems existing in the current legislation about "on the spot", that is, the absence of legislative interpretation and the judicial confusion caused by it, and reflect on this problem. The author thinks that we should perfect it from two aspects, that is, to perfect the system of interpretation in legislation, and to realize that "on the spot" as the space-time element of the crime of transformed robbery in the judicial practice. Considering that it is a combination of the concept of space and the concept of time, it is the joint point of the following acts such as theft, fraud, robbery and other subsequent acts such as violence and threats. This should be paid special attention to, in the perfection of judicial practice. It should be considered from three aspects: the continuity of time and space, the relevance of successive acts and the continuation of the pursuit of the state of affairs. The discussion in this paper is expected to be of benefit to the unification of legislative proposals and judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】