聚众斗殴罪的实务认定

发布时间：2018-03-11 03:00

本文选题：聚众斗殴　切入点：犯罪构成　出处：《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在我国现行刑法中，聚众斗殴罪的法条采取简单罪状方式表述，定义过于笼统和宽泛，在司法实践和认定上存在许多疑难问题。笔者结合司法实务中碰到的案例，对聚众斗殴罪犯罪构成的四个方面进行论述，，认为聚众斗殴罪侵害的是复杂客体，主观上不要求双方同时有斗殴故意且行为人不一定具有流氓动机，客观方面则表现为聚众和斗殴两个实行行为，犯罪主体中可能不存在首要分子。随后，笔者认为刑法第292条第二款的规定是注意规定，是转化犯而非想象竞合犯，对于司法实务中聚众斗殴罪的转化主体的认定和几种特殊情况一一列举并进行分析。最后，笔者结合较有影响的常熟聚众斗殴案，认为聚众斗殴中存在正当防卫情况，并对正当防卫的认定进行分析，以期对该罪的实务认定有所帮助。
[Abstract]:In the current criminal law of our country, the crime of affray is expressed in a simple way, the definition is too general and broad, and there are many difficult problems in judicial practice and cognizance. Four aspects of the constitution of the crime of affray are discussed. It is considered that the crime of affray infringes on the complex object, and subjectively does not require both sides to have the intention of brawl and the perpetrator does not necessarily have the motive of hooliganism. On the objective side, there may be no ringleaders in the subject of the crime. Then, the author thinks that the second paragraph of Article 292 of the Criminal Law is a regulation of attention, which is a transformed crime, not an imaginative co-offender. For the identification of the transforming subject of the crime of affray in the judicial practice and the analysis of several special circumstances, the author considers that there is a situation of justifiable defense in the affray case of Changshu, which is a relatively influential case of affray in Changshu. And the identification of self-defense is analyzed in order to help the practice of the crime.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】