受贿罪的司法适用困境与立法完善

发布时间：2018-03-13 07:36

本文选题：受贿罪　切入点：司法困境　出处：《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：受贿罪是指国家工作人员利用职务上的便利,索取他人财物的,或者非法收受他人财物,为他人谋取利益的行为。受贿犯罪是我国职务犯罪中社会危害性较大的一种,因而是目前反腐败的重中之重,随着社会经济发展,现行立法规定在当前反腐败形势面前越来越力不从心,在司法实践中带来的困境日渐明显。近年来理论界对受贿罪的立法问题研究较多,从调高法定刑的起点、设置独立的法定刑条款、死刑的废除等各方面都提出了各自不同的见解。特别在如何准确把握受贿罪构成要件,正确理解“为他人谋取利益”的性质及合理性,理论界存在较大的争议。本文在借鉴他人研究的基础上,从具有可操作性的角度出发,针对受贿罪认定在司法实践中存在的困境,通过对“为他人谋取利益”、既遂与未遂、“宽严相济”刑事司法政策的把握等的论述,提出现行受贿罪立法方面需要进行的完善,以期对受贿罪司法实践有所裨益。除引言和结语外,本文共分三个部分。第一部分案例简介。以典型案例为基础,通过对案例的介绍,分析指出司法判决对案件处理的主要分歧,并对存在的分歧及涉及的相关法律问题进行简要评析。第二部分受贿罪的司法困境及法律适用之把握。从典型案例出发,通过对受贿罪面临的司法困境进行分析,进一步探讨由这种困境体现出来的受贿罪部分构成要件在司法实践中的准确把握。针对受贿司法实践中对“感情投资”、“贿款公用”的认定,量刑随意性导致司法不平衡等问题,分析由此产生的司法困境及原因,对受贿罪“为他人谋取利益”要件、既遂认定标准、量刑轻刑化以及重处行贿罪的必要性等问题进行说明和论证,为司法实践提供借鉴。第三部分受贿罪的立法缺陷及完善。针对受贿罪立法缺陷,提出取消“为他人谋取利益”要件、设立罚金刑并改造受贿罪法定刑条款之构想。
[Abstract]:The crime of accepting bribes refers to the behavior of state functionaries who take advantage of their duties to obtain other people's property, or illegally accept other people's property and seek benefits for others. The crime of accepting bribes is one of the most harmful crimes in our country. As a result, it is a top priority in the fight against corruption at present. With the development of social economy, the current legislation and regulations are becoming more and more inadequate in the face of the current anti-corruption situation. In recent years, there has been more research on the legislative issues of bribery in the theoretical circle, from the starting point of raising the legal penalty, set up an independent statutory penalty clauses. The abolition of the death penalty has put forward different opinions, especially on how to accurately grasp the constitutive elements of the crime of accepting bribes, and to correctly understand the nature and reasonableness of "seeking benefits for others". There is a great controversy in the theoretical circle. Based on the study of others, this paper aims at the dilemma of the crime of accepting bribes in judicial practice from the point of view of maneuverability. Based on the discussion of "seeking benefits for others", accomplished and attempted, and the grasp of criminal judicial policy of "combining leniency with severity", this paper puts forward the perfection of the legislation on the crime of accepting bribes. In order to benefit the judicial practice of bribery, this paper is divided into three parts except introduction and conclusion. The first part of the case brief. Based on the typical case, through the introduction of the case, it points out the main differences of the judicial decision on the case handling. The second part is the judicial dilemma of bribery crime and the grasp of the application of the law. From the typical cases, through the analysis of the judicial dilemma faced by bribery crime, This paper further discusses the accurate grasp of the elements of the bribery crime embodied in this dilemma in judicial practice. In view of the determination of "emotional investment" and "common use of bribes" in the practice of accepting bribes, the arbitrary nature of sentencing leads to judicial imbalance, and so on. This paper analyzes the judicial dilemma and reasons, explains and demonstrates the elements of bribery crime, such as "seeking benefits for others", the standard of cognizance, the light punishment of sentencing and the necessity of imposing heavy punishment on bribery, and so on. The third part is about the legislative defects and perfection of the bribery crime. Aiming at the legislative defects of the bribery crime, this paper puts forward the idea of abolishing the elements of "seeking benefits for others", establishing the fine penalty and reforming the statutory penalty clause of the bribery crime.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.392

【参考文献】