“多次盗窃”的立法检讨与司法适用

发布时间：2018-03-15 12:02

本文选题：刑事政策　切入点：行为刑法　出处：《上海政法学院学报(法治论丛)》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国刑法盗窃罪中"多次盗窃"的立法变迁反映了劳教制度废除的背景下刑事政策对立法的重大影响。尽管与对特定行为之不法及程度的评价应以单次行为为基础的原则不相一致,但在我国当下却也具有必要性。实践中,"多次盗窃"的适用乱象并未随着司法解释对其"二年内盗窃三次以上"的界定而消弭,从而不得不对上述司法解释再行解释,这也反映出司法解释水平的欠缺和技术的粗糙。事实上,"二年内盗窃三次以上"应当被界定为未经任何法律规范处理的行政法意义上的盗窃行为,唯此方能实现行政法与刑法的衔接与协调。
[Abstract]:The legislative changes of "multiple theft" in the larceny of criminal law in our country reflect the significant influence of criminal policy on legislation under the background of abolishing the system of re-education through labour. Although, the evaluation of the lawlessness and degree of a particular act should be based on the single act. The basic principles are inconsistent. However, it is also necessary at present in our country. In practice, the confusion of the application of "multiple theft" has not been eliminated with the definition of "theft more than three times in two years" in the judicial interpretation, thus the judicial explanation mentioned above has to be explained again. This also reflects the lack of judicial interpretation and technical roughness. In fact, "theft more than three times in two years" should be defined as theft in the sense of administrative law that has not been dealt with by any legal norm. Only in this way can the connection and coordination between administrative law and criminal law be realized.
【作者单位】：重庆大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】