商业秘密刑事保护的理论证成和路径选择——以商业秘密最新相关立法为视角

发布时间：2018-03-16 22:03

本文选题：侵犯商业秘密罪　切入点：刑事保护　出处：《电子知识产权》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：2017年3月15日颁布的《民法总则》将"商业秘密"纳入知识产权客体予以保护;2017年11月4日通过《反不正当竞争法》对商业秘密的概念和举证责任也有所完善。这对商业秘密在刑法中应当如何保护都产生了影响,主要体现在:商业秘密的确权影响力辐射到刑法,更好地完成了刑民衔接,也再次明确了知识产权的私权特征,进而限制公权力的介入。而侵犯商业秘密罪的入刑门槛低,司法实践中犯罪率不高,侵权案件却不断的现象说明了刑法规制本身并非万能,对商业秘密的刑事保护需要有新的路径选择,实体法上要明晰罪过形式、重大损失的客观属性,诉讼法上提倡"三审合一"、"以审判为中心"。
[Abstract]:The General principles of Civil Law promulgated in March 15th 2017 protect "trade secrets" as the object of intellectual property rights, and the concept of trade secrets and the burden of proof are also improved through the Anti-unfair Competition Law in November 4th 2017. This has had an impact on how trade secrets should be protected in criminal law, It is mainly reflected in: the influence of the right of confirming trade secret radiates to the criminal law, completes the connection of criminal law and people better, clarifies once again the private right characteristic of intellectual property right, and then limits the intervention of public power, while the threshold of entry into criminal law for the crime of infringing trade secret is low. The phenomenon that the crime rate is not high in judicial practice, but the tort cases are not omnipotent, the criminal protection of trade secrets needs to have a new path choice, the substantive law should be clear about the form of crime, the objective attributes of heavy losses. The law of procedure advocates "three trials in one" and "taking trial as the center".
【作者单位】：同济大学上海国际知识产权学院;
【基金】：2017年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题《知识产权检察机构专门化研究》(项目号:GJ2017D20) 2016年度国家社科基金重大项目《我国刑法修正的理论模型与制度实践研究》之子课题四:刑法修正视野下的刑法改革与制度实践研究(项目号:16ZDA061)的阶段性研究成果 “同济大学中央高校基本科研业务费”资助
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】