寻衅滋事罪的认定难题及解决

发布时间：2018-03-16 23:31

  本文选题：寻衅滋事　切入点：客观行为　出处：《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：寻衅滋事罪在实践中为多发罪名，同时也是理论界和实践中存在争议较多的罪名，由于案件的多发，准确地界定此罪，将有助于司法实践中的认定。通常情况下，我们在寻衅滋事罪的认定上，主要有下面四个问题：第一，寻衅滋事罪规定了四种情形，每一种情形本质的认定问题。每一种情形本质的认定，直接关系寻衅滋事罪的成立与否以及此罪与他罪的界分，对这一问题的研究，至关重要。第二，除了寻衅滋事罪四种情形的本质认定问题外，每一种情形后都附有情节方面的规定，但对情节的限度内容却没有做出具体规定，也无相应的司法解释，造成实践中认定的混乱，亟待我们的解决。第三，实践中存在的本罪与他罪的界分难题，在刑法分则中，许多其他犯罪的客观情形都与本罪完全相同或类似，，导致实践中常发生同案不同判的情形，严重影响了我国司法的统一和权威。第四，关于寻衅滋事罪的第四种情形中的“公共场所”的认定，理论界基本不存在争议，但对于“网络空间”起哄闹事的情况是否属于寻衅滋事罪尚存在一定争论，随着两高于2013年9月一项司法解释的出台，此后的“网络”起哄闹事案，一律以寻衅滋事罪定罪处罚，这一司法解释的出台，解决了现有实践中多发的网络寻衅案件，是我国司法进程中的一大进步。笔者在文章的第四部分列举了一起网络起哄闹事的典型案列，详尽地阐明了该项司法解释的内容，以期望对我国的司法实践有所帮助。基于以上问题的存在，笔者找寻了实践中发生的寻衅滋事罪与其他罪较难区分的典型疑难案例，对寻衅滋事罪四种客观情形的本质内含进行了分析理解，对影响本罪认定的犯罪主观要件和客观要件的疑难问题进行了重点解析，最后结合案例，对寻衅滋事罪与其他犯罪进行了准确的界分。笔者通过对寻衅滋事罪各个方面的准确界定，以期解决其实践中存在的各项疑难，进而对我国的司法实践尽自己的一点绵薄之力，希望对司法实践的认定有所帮助。
[Abstract]:The crime of provoking and causing trouble is a multiple crime in practice, and it is also a controversial crime in theory and practice. Due to the multiplicity of cases, the accurate definition of this crime will be helpful to the determination of the crime in judicial practice. In the determination of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, we mainly have the following four problems: first, the crime of provoking and causing trouble stipulates four situations, the nature of each case, the nature of each situation, and the nature of each situation. It is of great importance to study this issue directly whether or not the crime of provoking and causing trouble is established or not, and whether this crime is divided into other crimes. Secondly, besides the essential determination of the four circumstances of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, In each case, there are provisions on the circumstances, but there are no specific provisions on the content of the limit of the circumstances, and there is no corresponding judicial interpretation, resulting in confusion in practice, which is urgently to be resolved by us. Third, In criminal law, the objective situation of many other crimes is exactly the same or similar to this crime, which often leads to different judgments of the same cases in practice. It has seriously affected the unity and authority of our country's judicature. 4th, regarding the determination of "public places" in the 4th cases of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, there is basically no dispute in the theoretical circle. However, there is still some controversy as to whether the "cyberspace" hooting is a crime of provocation and disturbance. With the introduction of two judicial interpretations higher than September 1st 2013, the subsequent "cyber" hooting cases, All of them were convicted and punished for the crime of provoking and causing trouble. With the introduction of this judicial interpretation, the frequent cases of online provocation in existing practice have been resolved. It is a great progress in the judicial process of our country. In the 4th part of the article, the author enumerates a typical case list of online hooting, and expounds the content of the judicial interpretation in detail. Based on the existence of the above problems, the author looks for typical difficult cases in which the crime of causing trouble and causing trouble is difficult to distinguish from other crimes in practice. This paper analyzes and understands the essence of the four objective circumstances of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, analyzes the difficult and difficult problems affecting the subjective and objective elements of the crime, and finally combines the case, Through the accurate definition of all aspects of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, the author hopes to solve the problems existing in his practice, and then to do his part in the judicial practice of our country. I hope it will be helpful to the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.36

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前7条

1 宋峰,曹红卫;试论寻衅滋事犯罪的司法认定[J];北京人民警察学院学报;2004年04期

2 周军;将寻衅滋事罪分解的可行性探究[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2004年03期

3 蒋华;;寻衅滋事犯罪中的几个问题探讨[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2009年S1期

4 何庆仁;寻衅滋事罪研究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2003年04期

5 谢锡美,张志军;寻衅滋事罪与抢劫罪之界限探析[J];政治与法律;2004年01期

6 杜启新,安文录;论寻衅滋事罪的合理定位[J];政治与法律;2004年02期

7 张明楷;;寻衅滋事罪探究(下篇)[J];政治与法律;2008年02期

本文编号：1622187