拒不执行判决、裁定罪客观要件研究

发布时间：2018-03-20 20:46

本文选题：拒不执行判决、裁定罪　切入点：客观要件　出处：《湘潭大学》2007年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 拒不执行判决、裁定罪严重损害了人民法院生效裁判的权威。在理论与司法实践中,对拒不执行判决、裁定罪的认定还存在着较大的争议,直接影响了该罪的正确适用。究其原因,主要在于对拒不执行判决、裁定罪客观要件的认识上存在分歧。本文从拒不执行判决、裁定罪的客观要件入手,着重对该罪的犯罪行为、犯罪对象和犯罪情节等要素进行了详细分析。拒不执行判决、裁定罪的犯罪行为由两部分构成,其中,“有能力执行”是前提条件,“拒不执行”是内容。在行为方式上,该罪只能由不作为的方式构成,且既包括积极身体举动的方式,也包含消极身体举动的方式;既包括暴力的方式,也包括非暴力的方式;既包括公然的方式,也包括隐蔽的方式。在行为的起算时间上,应以法院裁判生效为准。在犯罪对象的范围上,判决、裁定仅指法院依法定程序作出的具有执行内容的生效判决和裁定,不包含法院的其他法律文书,如调解书、决定、通知、支付令、函等。在犯罪情节上,只有“情节严重”方能构成本罪,情节是否严重,可从行为、行为的后果、执行标的等方面进行判断。本文最后还针对拒不执行判决、裁定罪在立法及司法实践中存在的问题,从修改“执行”一词的表述及扩大该罪犯罪对象的范围等两方面提出了完善的建议。
[Abstract]:Refusing to carry out a judgment seriously damages the authority of the people's court's effective judgment. In theory and judicial practice, there is still a great dispute over the determination of the adjudged crime for refusing to execute the judgment. It has a direct impact on the correct application of the crime. The main reason for the investigation is that there are differences in the understanding of the objective elements of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling the crime. This article starts with the objective elements of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling on the crime. The author analyzes the elements of the crime, such as the crime, the object and the circumstances of the crime in detail. The criminal act of refusing to execute the judgment consists of two parts, among which "having the ability to execute" is the precondition, and "refusing to execute" is the content. In the way of behavior, the crime can only be constituted by omission. Including both positive and negative physical actions; violent as well as non-violent; overt as well as covert. The entry into force of the decision of the court shall prevail. In the scope of the object of the crime, the judgment or order refers only to the effective judgment and order with enforcement content made by the court in accordance with the legal procedure, and does not include other legal instruments of the court, such as a conciliation statement, decision, notice, payment order, letter, etc. In terms of the circumstances of the crime, only the "serious circumstances" can constitute the crime, whether the circumstances are serious or not, can be judged from the aspects of the behavior, the consequences of the act, the target of execution, and so on. Finally, aiming at the problems existing in the legislation and judicial practice of refusing to execute the judgment and ruling the crime, the author puts forward some perfect suggestions from the aspects of modifying the expression of the word "execution" and expanding the scope of the object of the crime.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】