贪污受贿犯罪定罪量刑标准研究
本文选题:贪污贿赂犯罪 切入点:定罪 出处:《华中师范大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:当前,我国的反腐呼声前所未有,人民群众对于贪腐现象的惩治要求强烈,而党和政府对此异常重视。特别是党的十八大召开之后,将反腐工作摆上重要地位,加大反腐力度,合并成立监察委员会,将反腐工作推到最前线。从最开始提出的把“权力关进制度的笼子”到现在的“老虎苍蝇一起打”,无一不显示了新一届中央政府对反腐工作的重视,贪污受贿犯罪在腐败犯罪中居于重要地位,是最常见易发的腐败犯罪,对贪污受贿罪的定罪量刑是预防惩治腐败现象发生的有效手段,定罪量刑标准是否合理,是否适应社会发展,无一不对反腐工作产生重大影响,作为具有谦抑性的《刑法》对定罪量刑标准的设置,将对已经犯罪的腐败分子起到震慑作用,对其他人员起到预防作用,同时,考虑到人民大众目前对反腐工作的高度关注度,贪污受贿类犯罪的定罪量刑标准就显得尤其引人注目。就目前而言,《刑法修正案九》的出台,一定程度上适应了当前社会的发展,《刑法修正案九》对贪污受贿犯罪作出了重要的修改,伴随着2016年4月18日公布的《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的出台,反腐败工作又多一利器,对司法工作人员在司法实践中如何定罪量刑给出了明确的标准。然而,由于各地经济发展水平的不同,关于犯罪数额在贪污受贿犯罪定罪量刑中应居于何种地位,贪污受贿犯罪数额标准全国统一确定是否合理,贪污受贿罪是否分立,贪污受贿犯罪财产刑和生命刑的思考等,这些涉及如何更好的设置二罪法定刑的问题依然引发社会各界的广泛争议。因此,研究贪污受贿罪定罪量刑标准具有十分重要的现实意义。本文计划以刑法及其修正案为视角,旨在通过对我国现行刑法中对贪污受贿犯罪定罪量刑规定的分析,对现行刑法规定的积极意义,存在的缺陷进行研究,对当前我国刑法中关于贪污受贿犯罪提出可行的建议。全文计划分三大部分,第一部分主要是对中外贪污受贿犯罪定罪量刑规定的演化历史进行研究分析对比,了解贪污受贿犯罪的历史渊源,找出可借鉴之处。第二部分主要是对我国现行刑法也就是刑法修正案九中的亮点和重点进行了阐述和分析,肯定了刑九的积极贡献,同时从理论和现实出发,找出现行规定的不足之处。第三部分主要是针对查找出来的不足,提出相应的建议或解决办法。
[Abstract]:At present, the voice of anti-corruption in our country is unprecedented, and the people's demand for the punishment of corruption is strong, and the party and government attach great importance to it. Especially after the 18 National Congress of the Party, the anti-corruption work has been placed in an important position and anti-corruption efforts have been stepped up. The merger and establishment of a supervisory committee to push the anti-corruption work to the forefront. From the first proposal to put power in the cage of the system, to the present "tiger and fly fight together," all of them showed the importance attached by the new central government to anti-corruption work. The crime of corruption and bribery plays an important role in the crime of corruption and is the most common crime of corruption. The conviction and sentencing of the crime of corruption and bribery is an effective means to prevent and punish the phenomenon of corruption, and whether the standard of conviction and sentencing is reasonable or not. Whether or not to adapt to social development will have a significant impact on anti-corruption work. As a modest setting of the standard for conviction and sentencing in the Criminal Law, it will serve as a deterrent to corrupt elements who have already committed crimes and will play a preventive role for other personnel. At the same time, in view of the high level of public concern over anti-corruption, the standard of conviction and sentencing for corruption and bribery crimes is particularly striking. For the time being, the Ninth Amendment to the Criminal Law has been introduced. To a certain extent, it has adapted to the current social development. The Ninth Amendment to the Criminal Law has made important amendments to the crime of corruption and bribery, along with the publication of the Supreme people's Court on April 18th 2016. The introduction of the Supreme people's Procuratorate's explanation of some issues applicable to the Law in handling Criminal cases of Corruption and bribery. The introduction of the Supreme people's Procuratorate has given a clear standard on how judicial personnel can be convicted and sentenced in judicial practice. Because of the difference in the level of economic development in various places, what position should the amount of crime in the conviction and sentencing of corruption and bribery crime stand, whether the national standard of the amount of corruption and bribery crime is reasonable or not, and whether the crime of corruption and bribery is divided, Thinking about the crime of embezzlement and bribery, property penalty and life penalty, these problems related to how to better establish the legal penalty of second crime still cause wide controversy in all walks of life. It is of great practical significance to study the standard of conviction and sentencing for the crime of corruption and bribery. From the angle of criminal law and its amendment, this paper aims to analyze the sentencing provisions of conviction for corruption and bribery in the current criminal law of our country. This paper studies the positive significance and defects of the current criminal law, and puts forward some feasible suggestions on the crime of corruption and bribery in the current criminal law of our country. The full text plan is divided into three parts. The first part is mainly to analyze and compare the evolution history of conviction and sentencing provisions of corruption and bribery crime in China and abroad, to understand the historical origin of corruption and bribery crime. The second part mainly expounds and analyzes the highlights and emphases of the current criminal law of our country, that is, the ninth amendment of the criminal law, affirms the positive contribution of the nine sentences, and sets out from the theory and reality at the same time. Find out the shortcomings of the existing regulations. The third part is to put forward the corresponding suggestions or solutions in view of the deficiencies found out.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马晓霞;;浅析刑法“终身监禁”之适用[J];法制与社会;2016年36期
2 赵远;商浩文;;论贪污受贿犯罪死刑适用标准的合理确定[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2016年06期
3 宋久华;;论《刑法修正案(九)》中的职业禁止制度[J];刑法论丛;2016年01期
4 陈燕红;;贪污贿赂罪的死刑存废问题研究[J];法制博览;2015年35期
5 王涛;;关于贪污贿赂犯罪修正内容的述评[J];犯罪研究;2015年05期
6 汪勇;;《刑法修正案(九)》对贪污罪的修订及适用[J];中国审判;2015年20期
7 王林林;;论贪污、受贿罪的定罪量刑标准——以《刑法修正案(九)(草案)》为研究视角[J];刑法论丛;2015年02期
8 王文华;;贪污受贿罪定罪量刑标准的立法修改完善问题研究[J];刑法论丛;2015年02期
9 闫雨;;贪污受贿犯罪二元分立的定罪量刑标准研究[J];江西社会科学;2015年08期
10 赵秉志;;贪污受贿犯罪定罪量刑标准问题研究[J];中国法学;2015年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 郭振纲;;“重特大贪污受贿犯罪或被终身监禁”的多重意义[N];工人日报;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 陈渊崛;贪污受贿案件量刑问题研究[D];江西财经大学;2016年
2 段洪彬;论受贿罪的认定[D];对外经济贸易大学;2005年
,本文编号:1642146
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1642146.html