妨害司法犯罪的共犯罪责之认定

发布时间：2018-03-21 21:04

本文选题：妨害司法　切入点：本犯　出处：《法学》2015年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：犯罪人在犯罪后为逃脱罪责而实施虚假的供述、逃匿以及毁灭、伪造证据、掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得、犯罪所得收益等妨害司法的行为,客观上也妨害了司法秩序,但因缺乏适法行为的期待可能性,刑法才一般性地将本犯排除在本类罪的主体之外(本犯属于消极的责任身份)。从共同犯罪是违法形态的立场出发,本犯和第三人共同妨害司法的,应在违法层面上成立共同犯罪,但基于责任个别作用的原理,本犯因缺乏期待可能性而不以犯罪论处,对于第三人应以妨害司法犯罪的正犯或者共犯加以处罚。本犯的近亲属为使本犯逃脱罪责而妨害司法的,以及本犯为了逃避罪责而窝藏、包庇共犯人,帮助对方伪造、毁灭证据,或者阻止同案犯作供述或者指使同案犯作虚假供述、毁灭、伪造证据的,也不应以犯罪论处。
[Abstract]:In order to escape the criminal responsibility, the offender makes false statements, escapes and destroys, forges evidence, conceals, conceals, conceals the proceeds of crime, and so on hinders the administration of justice, objectively also hinders the judicial order, However, due to the lack of the expected possibility of appropriate legal acts, the criminal law generally excludes this crime from the subject of this type of crime (the crime belongs to the status of negative responsibility) and proceeds from the standpoint that the joint crime is an illegal form. If this offender and a third person jointly obstruct the administration of justice, they shall establish a joint crime at the level of violation of the law. However, based on the principle of the individual role of responsibility, this criminal is not punished as a crime because of the lack of the possibility of expectation. A third person shall be punished as a principal offender or an accomplice of a crime against justice. If a close relative of this crime obstructs justice in order to escape the criminal's criminal responsibility, and this criminal harbours in order to evade criminal responsibility, harbors an accomplice and assists the other party in forgery, Whoever destroys evidence or prevents accomplices from making confessions or instructs accomplices to make false statements, destroys or falsifies evidence shall not be punished as a crime.
【作者单位】：苏州大学王健法学院、江苏省区域法治发展协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目(编号:11CFX059) 江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】