论交通肇事罪与以危险方法危害公共安全罪的界分

发布时间：2018-03-24 01:31

本文选题：危险方法　切入点：过于自信过失　出处：《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来，随着恶性交通肇事案件频发，各地司法机关对以危险方法危害公共安全罪在公共交通运输领域的适用频率亦呈上升趋势。而关于交通肇事罪与以危险方法危险公共安全罪的界分，，学界观点并不十分明确，而当前司法机关的通常做法却是以交通肇事危害后果的严重程度来考量罪名的适用，这显然是不符合刑法规定的。因此，对于交通肇事罪与以危险方法危害公共安全罪作出明确的界分，对“危险方法”作出准确的阐释，是十分有必要的。本文通过分析交通肇事罪与以危险方法危害公共安全罪的核心区别，并结合其在我国刑法体系中的关系，归纳、总结二罪分别在客观方面、主观方面的界限，以达到将二罪界分开来的目的。全文共分三个部分。第一部分，包括经典案件的案情介绍及争议焦点归纳，提出问题，并为论文主体部分的分析内容提供切入点。第二部分是论文的主体及核心部分。界分交通肇事罪与以危险方法危害公共安全罪，首先，对于何为“危险方法”作出分析与讨论，对“危险方法”的本质及内涵进行揭示；其次，区分过于自信过失与间接故意，并联系实际探讨具体情况下行为人主观罪过的认定问题；再次，分析交通肇事罪能否转化为以危险方法危害公共安全罪；最后，分析“二次冲撞”理论的实质，并对最高人民法院《关于醉酒驾车犯罪法律适用问题的意见》进行评析。第三部分，评析案件，结合本文观点对论文第一部分所提出的争议案件进行分析讨论，用从实际案例分析的角度总结二罪的界分，并表达论文主旨。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the frequent occurrence of malignant traffic accidents, The judicial organs in various places also have an upward trend in the application frequency of the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous methods in the field of public transportation. However, the academic community does not have a clear view on the distinction between the crime of causing traffic accidents and the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous methods. At present, however, the normal practice of the judicial organs is to consider the application of the charges on the basis of the seriousness of the harm caused by the traffic accident. This is obviously not in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Law. It is very necessary to distinguish the crime of causing traffic trouble from the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous method and to give an accurate explanation of "dangerous method". Based on the analysis of the core differences between traffic accident crime and the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods, and the relationship between the crime and the criminal law system of our country, this paper sums up the boundary of the two crimes in objective and subjective aspects, respectively. In order to achieve the purpose of separating the two crimes, the paper is divided into three parts. The first part, including the case of classic cases and the focus of controversy induction, put forward questions, and provide a breakthrough point for the main part of the paper analysis. The second part is the main body and the core part of the thesis. The boundary divides the crime of causing traffic accident and endangering public safety by dangerous method. Firstly, it analyzes and discusses what is "dangerous method", and reveals the essence and connotation of "dangerous method". Secondly, distinguish between overconfident negligence and indirect intent, and discuss the identification of subjective guilt of the perpetrator under specific circumstances; thirdly, analyze whether the crime of traffic accident can be transformed into the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods; finally, The essence of the theory of "secondary collision" is analyzed, and the opinion of the Supreme people's Court on the legal application of drunken driving crime is analyzed. The third part analyzes the cases, analyzes and discusses the dispute cases proposed in the first part of this paper, summarizes the boundary of the two crimes from the point of view of actual case analysis, and expresses the main purpose of the paper.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】