受贿罪法定刑完善研究
发布时间:2018-03-25 04:12
本文选题:受贿罪 切入点:法定刑 出处:《华中师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:惩治受贿等腐败犯罪是廉政建设重点,构建合理的受贿罪法定刑对预防和惩治腐败犯罪有重要意义。而当前我国受贿罪法定刑采取与贪污罪法定刑相同的做法,在生命刑、财产刑、自由刑、资格刑等内容上产生了诸多问题,明显不能适应当前经济和社会形势及司法工作的需要。学界在上述问题上也并未达成一致意见。故文章拟在借鉴古今中外受贿罪的法定刑先进做法基础之上,联系我国司法实践,从生命刑、自由刑、财产刑等角度对受贿罪的法定刑进行探索并予以完善。全文分为以下几个部分: 第一部分对我国古代、民主革命时期、建国后关于受贿罪法定刑的沿革和特点予以概括,并且同当今刑法规定对比,总结古今异同。 第二部分联系当前司法实践情况,总结受贿罪法定刑规定存在的问题,这些问题包括受贿罪死刑是否应当废除及如何发展替代性措施、以数额作为受贿罪定罪量刑标准是否合理、以五千元作为受贿罪的起点是否适应当前经济发展形势之需要、怎样处理犯罪数额与犯罪情节的关系、自由刑档次和幅度交叉重复问题如何解决、受贿罪财产刑中罚金刑与没收财产刑如何选择适用、在受贿罪法定刑中如何增加资格刑等。 第三部分以典型国家和地区作为代表,对其受贿罪的法定刑规定予以阐释,对比和借鉴其合理成分并予以分析。例如美国在受贿罪的财产刑上很少适用没收财产这种刑罚,德国针对不同的公务身份在受贿罪法定刑上设置不同的法定刑,这些做法对我国当前受贿罪法定刑完善不乏借鉴的可能性。 第四部分针对当前我国受贿罪法定刑存在的问题,借鉴国内外受贿罪法定刑规定中的合理做法,从以下途径予以完善:一是建议取消死刑的适用;二是建立衔接有序、档次合理的自由刑;三是增设罚金刑且限制没收财产刑的适用;四是完善资格刑内容。
[Abstract]:Punishing the crime of corruption bribery is the key construction, reasonable construction of the bribery crime legal punishment to prevent and punish the crime of corruption is of great significance. And the legal punishment of bribery crime in our country take legal punishment and corruption in the same way, life penalty, freedom penalty, property penalty, qualification penalty and so on has many problems obviously, can not adapt to the needs of the current economic and social situation and judicial work. Scholars on the issue has not reached a consensus. So this article on the basis of legal punishment practices at all times and in all countries of the crime of accepting bribes, with China's judicial practice, from the death penalty, freedom penalty, legal punishment of bribery criminal property the angle of exploration and to be perfect. The full text is divided into the following parts:
The first part generalizes the evolution and characteristics of the statutory penalty for bribery crime in ancient China during the period of democratic revolution, and summarizes the similarities and differences between ancient and modern times compared with the provisions of today's criminal law.
The second part with the current judicial practice, summarize the existing provisions of the legal punishment of bribery crime problems, these problems include the bribery crime whether the death penalty should be abolished and how to develop alternative measures, as to the amount of bribery conviction and sentencing standards is reasonable, whether the starting point to five thousand yuan as the crime of accepting bribes to meet the needs of the current economic development situation, how to to deal with the relationship between the amount of crime and crime plot, freedom penalty grade and amplitude overlapping how to solve the problem, the bribery crime in the property penalty of fine penalty and the penalty of confiscation of property is how to choose, how to increase the qualification penalty in the legal punishment of bribery crime.
The third part of the typical countries and regions as the representative, the provisions of its legal punishment of bribery crime is explained, comparing and drawing lessons from the reasonable composition were analyzed. Such as the United States in the bribery crime penalty of property confiscation of property is rarely this penalty in Germany for different setting official body different legal punishment in legal punishment of bribery crime on the practice of China's current legal punishment of bribery crime has the possibility to perfect reference.
The fourth part of the legal punishment of bribery crime in our country currently existing problems, from domestic and foreign bribery provisions of the statutory sentence of the crime in a reasonable approach, to be perfect from the following ways: one is that for the abolition of the death penalty; the two is the establishment of cohesion and orderly, reasonable grade of imprisonment; three is additional fines and confiscation of property restrictions apply punishment; the four is to improve the qualification penalty.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.392
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙恒山;“腐败”概念的分析与刑法学思考[J];当代法学;2005年01期
2 梁统;资格刑之反思与重构——以剥夺政治权利为视角[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2003年02期
3 袁登明;;寻求缓解财产刑执行难之道在现有法律框架下的制度创建[J];法律适用;2006年07期
4 应秀良;;以罚金缴纳作为减刑条件的制度思考[J];法律适用;2007年01期
5 马克昌;;“宽严相济”刑事政策与刑罚立法的完善[J];法商研究;2007年01期
6 李海滢;麻锐;;腐败犯罪控制视野下的资格刑研究[J];法学杂志;2009年07期
7 谢望原;;欧陆刑罚改革成就与我国刑罚方法重构[J];法学家;2006年01期
8 陈雷;国际反腐败法律机制中的资产追回制度[J];法学;2004年08期
9 叶小琴;中国古代受贿犯罪立法的历史考察[J];江苏警官学院学报;2004年02期
10 杨彩霞;没收财产刑的困境与出路[J];华东政法学院学报;2001年04期
,本文编号:1661479
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1661479.html