与骗购经济适用住房有关的渎职行为研究

发布时间：2018-03-25 10:56

本文选题：经济适用住房　切入点：骗购　出处：《山东大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：经济适用住房是国家以物化的形式对城市住房困难人群的一种政策性保障,对解决城市低收入家庭住房困难起到了积极作用。但在经济适用住房的开发建设过程中,申购人购房信息造假、申购过程中暗箱操作、审查程序形同虚设、相关人员收受贿赂等问题层出不穷。经济适用住房与商品房之间巨大的差价诱惑,为权钱交易创造了空间,大量不符合条件的骗购者为骗购成功而与具有审批监管职权的相关单位或部门的工作人员进行不正当经济往来。在权力得不到有力制约和监督的情况下,“权力寻租”现象在所难免,与骗购经济适用住房有关的渎职行为成为了经济适用住房政策中的毒瘤。随着经济适用住房暴露的问题越发严重,学术理论界对骗购经济适用住房行为的开展了探讨和研究,但与骗购行为相关联的渎职行为仍属理论探讨的空白。与经济适用住房有关的渎职行为作为一种新兴的渎职行为,在案件定性、损失认定、因果关系认定等方面均值得探讨。笔者从职务犯罪侦查实务的角度,结合参与办理某市房管部门工作人员涉嫌渎职犯罪的案件的司法实践,对涉及经济适用住房的渎职行为进行分析和研究,意在评估经济适用住房制度,并提出预防和控制这种渎职行为的对策和建议。在经济适用住房申购审批过程中富有监管职责的国家机关工作人员,通过监守自盗、领导授意、权钱交易等方式,没有正确履行监管职责,致使不符合申购条件的行为人成功骗购经济适用住房,给国家造成了巨额经济损失。这些国家机关工作人员的行为应当构成刑法意义上的渎职。认定与骗购经济适用住房有关的渎职行为,要重点把握职务行为与最终房产被骗购的结果之间的因果关系。经济适用住房作为事关民生、民利、民心的工程,直接关系到社会和谐稳定和低收入群众的切身利益。在实践中,司法机关应当充分行使职能,对与骗购经济适用住房有关的渎职行为进行有力查处,为经济适用住房政策保驾护航。
[Abstract]:Affordable housing is a kind of policy guarantee for urban housing poor people in the form of materialization, which plays a positive role in solving the housing difficulties of low-income families in urban areas. However, in the process of development and construction of affordable housing, The information of requisitioners to purchase houses is falsified, the process of requisition is secretly operated, the examination procedures are virtually false, and the relevant personnel accept bribes, and so on. The huge price difference between affordable housing and commercial housing creates space for the trading of power and money. A large number of unqualified purchasers engaged in improper economic contacts with the staff of the relevant units or departments with the authority of examination and approval for the purpose of successful purchase. The phenomenon of "rent" is inevitable. Dereliction of duty related to the purchase of affordable housing has become a cancer in affordable housing policy. With the problem of exposure to affordable housing becoming more and more serious, the academic theorists have explored and studied the behavior of cheating on affordable housing. However, the dereliction of duty related to deception is still a blank in theoretical discussion. As a new kind of malfeasance, dereliction of duty related to affordable housing is identified as a case of characterization and loss. From the angle of the investigation practice of duty crime, the author combines the judicial practice of taking part in handling the cases of the staff of the housing management department of a certain city suspected of dereliction of duty. This paper analyzes and studies malfeasance related to affordable housing, which is intended to evaluate the system of affordable housing, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to prevent and control such malfeasance. The functionaries of state organs with supervisory responsibilities in the process of examination and approval of affordable housing applications have failed to properly perform their supervisory duties by means of self-invigilation, leadership instructions, power and money transactions, etc. As a result, the actor who does not meet the requisition conditions successfully tricked in the purchase of affordable housing, The actions of the functionaries of these state organs should constitute dereliction of duty in the sense of criminal law. It is necessary to focus on the causal relationship between job behavior and the result of the final property purchase. Affordable housing is a project that affects people's livelihood, people's interests, and people's hearts. It is directly related to the vital interests of the harmonious and stable society and the low-income masses. In practice, the judicial organs should fully exercise their functions and effectively investigate and deal with malfeasance related to the fraudulent purchase of affordable housing. Escort for affordable housing policy.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F299.23;D924.393

【参考文献】