法律对妇女权益的优越性保护——基于性犯罪应当适用精神损害赔偿的分析

发布时间：2018-03-28 07:46

本文选题：妇女权益　切入点：性犯罪　出处：《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：法释[2012]21号中剥夺性犯罪被害人精神损害求偿权的规定违宪违法,刑法与民法功能分野下刑罚的施加无法冲抵被害人的精神损害,该损害的量化可以阻却"水闸效应"的发生。性犯罪中适用精神损害赔偿有其法律基础,同时也是合乎法律逻辑和借鉴比较法主流经验的恰当结论。其适用可以通过刑事附带民事诉讼解决,数额相对统一的同时还应当体现对成年妇女、未成年妇女和14周岁以下幼女权益的区别性保护。精神类疾病可以作为确定精神损害赔偿数额的参考要素,但不能成为赔与不赔的认定标准。
[Abstract]:In the legal interpretation [2012] 21, the provisions of depriving the victims of sexual crimes of their right to claim compensation for mental damage are unconstitutional and illegal, and the imposition of penalties under the separation of the functions of criminal law and civil law cannot offset the mental damage of the victims. The quantification of the damage can prevent the "sluice effect" from occurring. The application of mental damage compensation in sexual crimes has its legal basis. It is also an appropriate conclusion which is logical in law and draws lessons from mainstream experience in comparative law. Its application can be resolved through civil proceedings incidental to criminal proceedings, and the amount should be relatively uniform and should also be reflected in the case of adult women, The differential protection of the rights and interests of minor women and young girls under 14 years of age. Mental illness can be regarded as the reference element to determine the amount of compensation for mental damage, but it cannot be regarded as the standard of recognition of compensation and non-compensation.
【作者单位】：烟台大学法学院;
【基金】：山东省法学会2017年度省级法学研究课题专项课题“《民法总则》中免责事由的解释与适用”(SLS(2017)B24-2) 2017年度黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究专项项目“龙江丝路带视角下多元化纠纷解决机制研究”(17FXD165)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】