论“人身骚扰型”寻衅滋事罪

发布时间：2018-03-30 03:03

本文选题：“人身骚扰型”寻衅滋事罪　切入点：构成要件　出处：《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：寻衅滋事罪是从1979年《刑法》中的流氓罪分解而来的罪名,刑法将其犯罪的构成要件分为四个方面。但是刑法缺少对寻衅滋事罪的定义,全国人大及其常委会、最高人民法院和最高人民检察院也并没有做出相应的立法或司法解释等。因此在司法实践中各地对寻衅滋事罪的认定有所不同。“人身骚扰型”寻衅滋事罪所保护的特定法益是不特定人或者一般人在社会生活、公共活动中的行动自由与名誉及自由意志。在司法实践中,认定“人身骚扰型”寻衅滋事罪时不需要流氓动机。在对该类型犯罪进行法律解释时,需要牢牢把握法益这一准绳,在区分罪与非罪,此罪与彼罪的过程中亦是如此。虽然2013年出台了与该罪有关的司法解释,但是在司法实践中仍然暴露出许多法律上的问题亟待解决,例如,刑期设置过高,部分术语含义不够明确,等等。
[Abstract]:The crime of provoking and causing trouble is a charge broken down from the crime of hooliganism in the 1979 Criminal Law. The criminal law divides the elements of the crime into four facets. However, the criminal law lacks a definition of the crime of provoking and causing trouble, and the National people's Congress and its standing Committee, The Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate have not made any corresponding legislative or judicial explanations. Therefore, in judicial practice, the identification of the crime of provoking and causing trouble is different in various places, and the crime of "physical harassment" is protected by the crime of provoking and causing trouble. The specific legal interest of the individual is that the individual or the average person is in social life, Freedom of movement and reputation and free will in public activities. In judicial practice, there is no need for hooligan motives in determining the crime of "physical harassment" to provoke trouble. In the legal interpretation of this type of crime, one needs to firmly grasp the criterion of legal interest. This is also the case in the process of distinguishing between crime and non-crime. Although a judicial interpretation of the crime was introduced in 2013, many legal problems remain to be solved in judicial practice, such as excessive prison terms. Some terms are not clear enough, etc.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】