当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

聚众淫乱罪探析

发布时间:2018-03-30 17:31

  本文选题:聚众 切入点:淫乱 出处:《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:聚众淫乱罪是在1997年刑法修订时由原来的“流氓罪”分离而来的一个罪名,,属于妨害社会管理秩序罪一章中的一种具体犯罪。然而近些年来,尤其是南京副教授马尧海一案发生以后,关于聚众淫乱罪的争论越发激烈,围绕着该罪的存废出现了很多的观点。本文从聚众淫乱罪所侵犯的法益,何为聚众、淫乱,何为首要分子与多次参加者及本罪的犯罪形态等争议问题对聚众淫乱罪进行解读,以利司法实践中能正确认定本罪,还指出我国现行相关立法存在的不足,提出了自己的完善建议。 全文共分三个部分。 第一部分聚众淫乱罪概述。主要从聚众淫乱罪的由来出发,通过对各个国家和地区关于该类型犯罪的规定的介绍,看出其他国家或地区的刑事立法对公然的淫乱行为或猥亵行为,无论参与者的多寡均认定为犯罪。而对于成人间自愿私密的淫乱行为,排除于犯罪之外。这些作法具有合理性值得我国借鉴。 第二部分聚众淫乱罪认定中几个争议问题。在这部份分析了本罪侵犯的法益是社会风化,聚众的含义是包括聚众者在内有三人或三人以上;淫乱的含义指男女性器官结合的自然性行为和同性或异性之间的口交、肛交行为。本罪是复行为犯,聚众为着手,实施了淫乱,而不管淫乱行为是否完成均为既遂。 第三部分聚众淫乱罪的立法缺陷及修改建议。在本部份分析了现行刑法将成人自愿、私密进行的多人淫乱行为纳入犯罪圈不具合理性,而对当众进行的两人间的淫乱或猥亵行为又无法治罪。应废除本罪,新增公然淫乱、猥亵罪,并严格限定公然、猥亵的具体含义。
[Abstract]:The crime of mass adultery is a separate crime from the original "hooliganism" when the Criminal Law was amended in 1997. It is a specific crime in the chapter on the crime of endangering the social management order. However, in recent years, Especially after the case of Ma Yao-hai, an associate professor in Nanjing, the debate on the crime of mass adultery has become more and more intense, and many viewpoints have emerged around the retention and abolition of the crime. What are the controversial issues, such as ringleader, multiple participants and the criminal form of this crime, to interpret the crime of mass prostitution in order to correctly identify this crime in judicial practice, and also to point out the shortcomings of the current relevant legislation in our country? Put forward own perfect suggestion. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part is an overview of the crime of mass adultery. Mainly from the origin of the crime of mass adultery, through the introduction of the provisions of various countries and regions on this type of crime, It can be seen that the criminal legislation of other countries or regions regards blatant obscenity or indecent conduct as a crime, regardless of the number of participants. These practices are reasonable and worthy of our country's reference. In the second part, the author analyzes that the legal interest of this crime is social decency, which means that there are three or more people including the crowd; The meaning of promiscuity refers to the natural sexual behavior of the combination of male and female sexual organs and the oral sex and anal sex between the same sex and the opposite sex. This crime is a double act crime, gathering a crowd to carry out sexual promiscuity, regardless of whether the promiscuous act is completed or not, it is accomplished. The third part analyzes the legislative defects and amendment proposals of the crime of mass fornication. In this part, the author analyzes that it is not reasonable for the current criminal law to bring into the criminal circle multi-person sexual promiscuity, which is carried out voluntarily and privately by adults. But the public conduct between two persons of obscenity or indecency can not be criminalized. Should abolish this crime, new public obscenity, indecent assault, and strictly limit the specific meaning of open, indecent.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张明楷;论刑法的谦抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1995年04期

2 张正新,金泽刚;论我国刑法中的聚众犯罪[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1997年05期

3 李银河;;对取消聚众淫乱罪提案的解释[J];法制资讯;2010年04期

4 何显兵;论男性贞操权的刑法保护[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2004年04期

5 王锐园;;对我国刑法中聚众淫乱罪的思考[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2012年01期

6 王恩海;;无被害人犯罪与非犯罪化[J];华东刑事司法评论;2004年02期

7 黄京平;陈鹏展;;无被害人犯罪非犯罪化研究[J];江海学刊;2006年04期

8 李银河;中国当代性法律批判[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2004年01期

9 张野驰;;浅析聚众淫乱罪[J];安徽警官职业学院学报;2012年02期

10 彭文华;性权利的国际保护及我国刑法立法之完善[J];法学论坛;2002年05期



本文编号:1686905

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1686905.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户ac2d1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com