纯正的过失犯与不纯正的过失犯:立法比较与学理探究

发布时间：2018-03-30 13:35

本文选题：过失犯　切入点：纯正的过失犯　出处：《法学家》2015年06期

【摘要】：刑法中的过失犯可以分为纯正的过失犯与不纯正的过失犯,前者是指只能由过失构成的过失犯,而后者是指既可以由故意构成又可以由过失构成的过失犯。从我国刑法规定上对这两种过失犯进行描述与比较可发现,二者在立法上具有不同的特征。在此基础上,区分纯正的过失犯与不纯正的过失犯具有多方面的理论意义,刑法规定的"过失犯罪,法律有规定的才负刑事责任"只适用于不纯正的过失犯而不适用于纯正的过失犯。不纯正的过失犯与故意犯共用一个构成要件,因而其实行行为也是共同的;但纯正的过失犯则具有独立的构成要件,其实行行为需要专门讨论。最后,纯正的过失犯与不纯正的过失犯的区分对于确定过失在三阶层犯罪论体系中的地位也具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:The negligent crime in criminal law can be divided into pure negligent crime and unpure negligent crime, the former refers to the negligent crime which can only be constituted by negligence. The latter refers to the negligent crime, which can be constituted both intentionally and negligently. From the description and comparison of the criminal law of our country, we can find that the two kinds of negligent offenders have different characteristics in legislation. It is of great theoretical significance to distinguish the pure negligent crime from the unpure negligent crime, and the criminal law stipulates "negligent crime". The criminal liability of the only person under the law "is only applicable to the innocent negligent offender, but not to the pure negligent offender. The innocent negligent offender and the intentional offender share a common constitutive element, so their acts are also common;" But pure negligent offense has its own constituent elements, and its practice needs special discussion. Finally, the distinction between pure negligent offender and unpure negligent offender is also of great significance in determining the position of fault in the three-class crime theory system.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924

【共引文献】