刑法第306条争议问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-31 03:31

本文选题：《刑法》第306条　切入点：争议问题　出处：《重庆大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：作为1997年刑法典的新增条款之一，刑法第306条从设立之时起，直至十几年之后的今天，围绕该条的争议便从未平息，主张废除该条的声音也不曾减弱。尤其是近年来发生的李庄案与广西“北海律师被抓事件”（四名律师因涉嫌触犯刑法第306条被捕），让刑法第306条再次进入公众的视线，法律适用与司法实践中所暴露出来的问题亟待解决。本文以分析有关刑法第306条的争议焦点为切入点，否定了主废论者的观点、明确了刑法第306条与相邻法条的适用范围界限、澄清了刑法第306条实施以来的司法现状，指出应当从刑事实体法与刑事程序法相结合的角度对法条的具体内容进行系统性、全面性的理解，并提出了关于完善追究本罪刑事责任的特别司法处理程序的具体建议。本文共分为四个部分。第一部分从阐述刑法第306条的立法背景入手，指出了刑法第306条罪名的由来以及增设该法条的现实意义，紧接着指出了刑法第306条施行后所出现的理论与实践方面的问题。第二部分从宏观的角度对有关刑法第306条的争议焦点进行了分析，在对主废论者的观点进行反驳的基础上，进一步明确了刑法第306条与第305条、307条的界定与区分，并以一定的数据和资料澄清了有关刑法第306条司法现状的争议，论述了刑法第306条存在的合理性与必要性。第三部分，结合国内学者对本罪的行为对象、行为方式、成立标准等方面的观点，以对刑法进行系统性、全面性的解释为指导原则，对法律条文的具体含义进行了正确的理解，对本罪的成立标准予以阐释，重新申明了本罪是行为犯而不是结果犯。第四部分，从司法实践的角度，，一方面指出了对与刑法第306条有关的错案进行追究的举措，另一方面立足于防止刑法第306条被滥用的角度提出了保证刑法第306条正确实施的证明标准及相应的程序措施。
[Abstract]:As one of the new articles in the Criminal Code of 1997, article 306 of the Criminal Code has never died down from the time of its establishment until today, more than a decade later. In particular, the Li Zhuang case in recent years and the "arrest of lawyers in Beihai" in Guangxi (four lawyers arrested on suspicion of violating Article 306 of the Criminal Law) allowed Article 306 of the Criminal Law to enter the public eye again. The application of the law and the problems exposed in the judicial practice should be solved urgently. This paper, based on the analysis of the dispute focus of Article 306 of the Criminal Law, negates the viewpoint of the principal abrogate, and clarifies the limits of the application of Article 306 of the Criminal Law and the adjacent articles of the Criminal Law. This paper clarifies the judicial status since the implementation of Article 306 of the Criminal Law, and points out that the concrete content of the article should be systematically and comprehensively understood from the angle of the combination of the criminal substantive law and the criminal procedure law. It also puts forward some specific suggestions on how to perfect the special judicial procedure for investigating the criminal responsibility of this crime. This article is divided into four parts. The first part begins with the legislative background of article 306 of criminal law, points out the origin of the crime of article 306 of criminal law and the practical significance of adding this article. Then it points out the problems in theory and practice after the implementation of Article 306 of Criminal Law. The second part analyzes the controversy focus of article 306 of criminal law from the macroscopic angle, and further clarifies the definition and distinction between article 306 and article 305 of criminal law on the basis of refuting the views of the principal abolitionist. With certain data and data, the author clarifies the dispute about the judicial status of Article 306 of the Criminal Law, and discusses the rationality and necessity of the existence of Article 306 of the Criminal Law. The third part, combined with the domestic scholars' views on the behavior object, behavior mode, establishment standard and so on, take the systematic and comprehensive interpretation of the criminal law as the guiding principle. This paper correctly understands the specific meaning of the legal provisions, explains the standard of the establishment of the crime, and restates that the crime is an act crime rather than a result crime. The fourth part, from the angle of judicial practice, on the one hand, points out the measures to investigate the wrong cases related to Article 306 of the Criminal Law. On the other hand, it puts forward the standard of proof and corresponding procedural measures to ensure the correct implementation of Article 306 of Criminal Law from the point of view of preventing the abuse of Article 306 of Criminal Law.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】