网络共犯类型认定探析

发布时间：2018-03-31 05:16

本文选题：网络共同犯罪　切入点：组织犯　出处：《安徽大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：网络由以往的信息桥梁转变为现实生活空间的延伸平台,公共空间与私人空间在网络世界都已逐渐形成,网络共同犯罪作为网络犯罪的一部分,其内部结构和外部表现的异化特征越来越明显,仅仅适用传统的共同犯罪形态认定理论将达不到很好的评价效果甚至会出现罪责刑不相适应的弊端。随着我国《刑法修正案(九)》的出台,关于网络共同犯罪中服务商的中立帮助行为有了归罪依据,这是对网络异化下的帮助行为正犯化的回应,也是对传统共犯理论改革的提示和建议。面对日益突出的网络共同犯罪问题,理论方面的改革和立法方面的完善是两大解决路径。网络共同犯罪问题的研究范围主要包括纯粹的以及传统与网络相结合的共同犯罪这两种情形,二者共同之处在于不仅具有普通网络犯罪的虚拟性、技术性、隐蔽性,并且在这些特性影响之下还产生了具体结构上、行为方式上及分工作用上的变异。网络共同犯罪异化表现之一是结构方面的规模膨胀但各个行为人之间又极度松散；二是关于行为人之间意思联络和行为独立化趋势。网络空间中组织行为的主导地位逐渐从犯化,并且与教唆行为的界限模糊化,若继续以主犯的标准衡量网络组织行为将不符合罪责刑相适应原则。同时,以组织犯为例实行者的身份与年龄认识问题也影响着其他共犯人的定罪量刑,如何运用传统理论定性网络空间中的组织行为主要还是从主客观方面出发明确行为性质上的界限以及对对方身份和年龄的认识程度。在网络空间中,教唆者可能会以实质性的帮助为诱惑唆使他人犯罪,从而此类唆使行为与帮助行为界限模糊不清,教唆对象的不特定性也提高了教唆犯的认定难度。本文主要从网络空间中教唆行为传统理论的灵活调整适用明确该行为的主客观构成及与帮助行为的界限。现有立法规定中立帮助行为独立定罪,但帮助行为的正犯化还存在理论争议,同时司法实践中个案的多样性和特殊性要求帮助行为的具体认定还需要完善和优化。具体主要从网络共同犯罪的一般性规定和具体性规定,明晰现有《刑法》对帮助行为认定标准之“情节严重”的设定。
[Abstract]:The network changes from the information bridge in the past to the extension platform of the real life space, the public space and the private space have gradually formed in the network world, the network joint crime is a part of the network crime. The dissimilation characteristics of its internal structure and external performance are becoming more and more obvious. Only applying the traditional theory of joint crime pattern identification will not achieve a very good evaluation effect or even appear the malpractice that the punishment of crime is not suitable. With the introduction of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) in our country, The neutral help behavior of the service provider in the network joint crime has the basis of imputation, which is the response to the network alienation. It is also a hint and suggestion for the reform of the traditional accomplice theory. In the face of the increasingly prominent problem of network joint crime, The theoretical reform and the legislative perfection are the two major ways to solve the problem. The research scope of the network joint crime mainly includes the two situations of pure and traditional joint crime combined with the network. What they have in common is that they not only have the fictitious, technical and hidden nature of ordinary cybercrime, but also produce concrete structure under the influence of these characteristics. One of the manifestations of the alienation of network common crime is the expansion of the scale of the structure but the extremely loose between the various actors; The second is about the tendency of intention communication and behavior independence among the actors. The dominant position of organizational behavior in cyberspace is becoming accessory gradually, and the boundary between organization and abetment is blurred. If we continue to measure the behavior of network organization according to the standard of the principal offender, it will not conform to the principle of adaptation of crime, responsibility and punishment. At the same time, the problem of identity and age cognition of the perpetrator, for example, will also affect the conviction and sentencing of other accomplices. How to use the traditional theory to characterize the organizational behavior in cyberspace is mainly to clarify the boundary of the nature of behavior and the understanding of the identity and age of each other from the subjective and objective aspects. An abettor may entice others to commit a crime with material assistance, thus blurring the line between such abetting and aiding, The instigator's non-specific nature also increases the difficulty of the instigator's identification. This paper makes clear the subjective and objective composition of the act and the boundary between the aiding behavior and the subject-objective composition of the act from the flexible adjustment of the traditional theory of abetting act in cyberspace. The legislation provides for neutral assistance in the criminalization of independent conduct, However, there is still a theoretical dispute over the criminal nature of aiding behavior. At the same time, the diversity and particularity of individual cases in judicial practice also need to be perfected and optimized. Clarify the existing Criminal Law to help the behavior of the identification of the standard of "serious circumstances" set.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】