“扒窃”的认定标准探讨

发布时间：2018-03-31 07:28

本文选题：扒窃　切入点：公共场所　出处：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：最新出台的《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理盗窃刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》对“扒窃”的定义是在公共场所或者公共交通工具上盗窃他人随身携带的财物，“公共场所”和“随身携带”是认定扒窃的两个核心要素。对“公共场所”和“随身携带”的解释应当从立法意图和预期后果出发，“公共场所”的本质属性是人流量大并且人员组成不特定，这种本质特征不受人为因素的影响，也不随时间和人数的变化而变化；“随身携带”应当作限缩解释，仅仅指他人身上的财物。并且，对于“扒窃”属于结果犯还是行为犯还存在争议，这对“扒窃”行为的定性也十分重要，，“扒窃”属于盗窃罪的一种行为方式，其侵犯的法益与普通盗窃行为是一致的，故其仍属于结果犯的范畴，因而对于“扒窃”行为的既未遂的认定应当参照盗窃罪。在理清“扒窃”的内涵之后，我们需要进一步讨论“扒窃”是否一律入罪的问题，根据立法意图我们可以对一些“扒窃”偶犯、初犯等轻微“扒窃”作非罪化处理，而我国的二元立法模式和“但书”规定则是轻微“扒窃”出罪的依据。
[Abstract]:The newly promulgated Supreme people's Court, Interpretation by the Supreme people's Procuratorate on certain issues of the Law applicable to handling Criminal cases of Theft "pickpocketing" is defined as theft of property carried by others in public places or on public transport, "public places" and. "carrying with you" is the two core elements in determining pickpocketing. The interpretation of "public place" and "carry-on" should be based on the legislative intent and expected consequences. The essential attribute of "public place" is that the flow of people is large and the composition of personnel is not specific. This essential characteristic is not affected by human factors, nor does it change with time and number of persons; "carry with you" should be interpreted as limiting, referring only to property in others... and, There are still disputes about whether pickpocketing is a result crime or an act criminal, which is also very important to the characterization of "pickpocketing". Pickpocketing is a kind of behavior of larceny, and the legal interest of its infringement is consistent with that of ordinary theft. Therefore, it still belongs to the category of result crime, so the identification of the attempted act of "pickpocketing" should refer to the crime of larceny. After clarifying the connotation of "pickpocketing", we need to further discuss whether "pickpocketing" should be uniformly criminalized. According to the legislative intention, we can decriminalize some minor "pickpockets", such as "pickpocketing" and minor "pickpocketing", while the dualistic legislative model and the proviso of our country are the basis of the crime of minor "pickpocket".
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.35

【参考文献】