紧急避险适用主体的特殊情形
发布时间:2018-03-31 15:22
本文选题:紧急避险 切入点:特定责任人 出处:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:紧急避险作为一项古老的法律制度,其概念和内容得到了不断的深化与发展,保护的范围不仅从利益扩展到权益,而且当保护权益与损害权益相等时也逐步得到了认可,但过往对于紧急避险的适用主体很少得到论述。我国刑法法条将职务上、业务上负有特定责任的人排除适用紧急避险。首先,职务上、业务上的这种定义涵盖面相对较窄,不符合法条定义的概括性;其次,特定责任人应该是有相对的冒险义务而不是绝对的危险承担义务,所以在特殊情形下特定责任人也有适用的必要。自招危险在适用紧急避险时法条并没有任何规定,但由于存在无辜第三人的权益受损,这种特殊的危险来源适用紧急避险时理应得到一定的限制。在承认所有的避险行为的基础上,从行为发生的整体角度来分析自招危险与紧急避险的关系。对紧急避险中无辜第三人的反击行为性质的定性,既应当考虑社会的整体权益,也应考虑到无辜第三人的权益问题,应立足于公民合法权益不可侵犯的出发点,,以无辜第三人的视角来看待反击行为,给反击行为定性。
[Abstract]:As an ancient legal system, the concept and content of emergency risk avoidance have been continuously deepened and developed. The scope of protection is not only extended from interests to rights and interests, but also gradually recognized when the protection of rights and interests is equal to damage rights and interests.However, in the past, the subject of emergency risk avoidance has rarely been discussed.The criminal law of our country excludes the application of emergency risk-aversion to the person who has special duty in duty and business.First, in terms of function, the definition of business is relatively narrow and does not conform to the generality of the definition of the law; secondly, the particular person responsible should have a relative obligation to take risks rather than an absolute obligation to take risks.Therefore, under special circumstances, the specific responsible person also has the necessity to apply.There is no stipulation in applying the law of emergency risk avoidance, but due to the damage of the rights and interests of innocent third party, this special source of danger should be limited when it is applied to emergency risk avoidance.Based on the recognition of all risk-averse behaviors, the relationship between self-admission risk and emergency risk avoidance is analyzed from the overall point of view of behavior occurrence.The characterization of the nature of the counterattack behavior of innocent third parties in emergency safe havens should take into account both the overall rights and interests of society and the rights and interests of innocent third parties, and should be based on the inviolable starting point of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens,Look at counterattack behavior from the perspective of innocent third person, and characterize counterattack behavior.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 胡嘉金;王昭振;;论紧急避险中“自招危险”的理论诠释及内在价值构造——以作为义务为视角[J];法学评论;2007年03期
2 乔青;;特定责任人的紧急避险权——基于上海“7·17”特大火灾的思考[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2009年02期
3 陈凌;;论自招危险中的紧急避险[J];今日南国(理论创新版);2009年08期
4 陈璇;;自招危险情形下的紧急避险问题研究[J];江西公安专科学校学报;2007年01期
5 刘明祥;论紧急避险的性质[J];法学研究;1997年04期
6 黎宏;;紧急避险法律性质研究[J];清华法学;2007年01期
7 黎宏;;论正当防卫与紧急避险的界限[J];人民检察;2006年11期
8 李佳丽;;自招危险的紧急避险[J];天津市经理学院学报;2008年06期
9 张明楷;;论偶然防卫[J];清华法学;2012年01期
10 王钢;;紧急避险中无辜第三人的容忍义务及其限度兼论紧急避险的正当化根据[J];中外法学;2011年03期
本文编号:1691312
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1691312.html