状态犯研究

发布时间：2018-04-05 02:20

本文选题：状态犯　切入点：罪数形态　出处：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：状态犯这一概念虽然时有提起，但是我国刑法理论研究并未对其作出专门的研究及整合，对于状态犯的细致分析和认识具有重要的现实意义。目前国内学者对于状态犯概念的界定各有说法，并未形成一个统一的概念表述形式，也未对其进行专门的研究和探讨，在刑法理论上还有极大空白。因此，有必要对状态犯进行深入研究，做出归纳总结，以便整合各位学者的学说得到确定的概念表述形式，并从更为科学合理的角度提出状态犯的概念以及通过对其特征的分析，从而与相关犯罪形态相区别，厘清与其他犯罪形态的关系。状态犯作为一种犯罪形态，其特征及表现形式素有争议，因而对于状态犯所对应的具体犯罪的认定也众说纷纭，尤其是对于绑架罪、重婚罪、拐骗儿童罪以及收买被拐卖妇女、儿童罪等，，这些争议都将直接影响定罪量刑，从而为实现设置该罪名的现实目的制造规范适用上的混乱或障碍。因此，准确阐述和归纳状态犯的特征，有助于相关犯罪的定性、归类，从而有效指导定罪量刑的司法实践活动。据此，本文将分为以下几个部分进行论述：第一部分主要阐述状态犯的理论维度。其中包括对状态犯是否是一种独立的犯罪形态的争议进行评述，如何对状态犯的概念进行重新厘定以及状态犯在刑法理论体系的定位问题。首先必须肯定状态犯是一种独立的犯罪形态，然后对状态犯的内部构造进行分析，得出状态犯应定位于罪数形态理论领域的结论，从而形成对状态犯概念的新的理解，并由此阐述状态犯的基本特征。第二部分主要具体介绍状态犯与罪数形态理论的关系。既然状态犯应定位于罪数形态论范畴，就必须厘清二者之间的内部关系。首先是对状态犯属于何种罪数类型的讨论，从罪数论的角度阐述状态犯属于典型的一罪类型，其次再将状态犯与继续犯、即成犯进行细致的区分，以达到准确认定状态犯的目的。第三部分是关于状态犯与事后行为理论的阐述。具体阐述事后行为论与状态犯之间的关系，状态犯与事后行为理论具有极大的契合度，特别是共罚的事后行为可以说是属于状态犯一身专属的理论，在实践中对于状态犯的处理基本是适用共罚的事后行为理论加以解决，其次明确可罚的事后行为与状态犯的关系。第四部分主要是对状态犯相关罪名的认定。在刑法理论上哪些罪名属于状态犯或不是状态犯存在很大的争议，本文选择几个罪名进行分析。首先是对典型的状态犯类型进行阐述，包括盗窃罪、侵占罪等；其次是几个争议较大的罪名，诸如绑架罪、拐骗儿童罪、重婚罪、拐卖妇女、儿童罪以及收买被拐卖的妇女、儿童罪等。
[Abstract]:Although the concept of state crime has been brought up from time to time, the theoretical study of criminal law in our country has not made a special research and integration, which has important practical significance for the careful analysis and understanding of state crime.At present, domestic scholars have different views on the definition of the concept of state crime, and have not formed a unified form of concept expression, nor have they made a special study and discussion on it. There is still a great gap in the theory of criminal law.Therefore, it is necessary to make an in-depth study of the state crime and make an induction and summary, so as to integrate the conceptual expressions defined by the scholars' doctrines.And from a more scientific and reasonable point of view put forward the concept of state crime and through the analysis of its characteristics so as to distinguish from the related forms of crime and clarify the relationship between the other forms of crime.As a form of crime, the characteristics and manifestations of state crime are controversial, so there are different opinions on the specific crimes corresponding to state crime, especially for kidnapping, bigamy, abduction of children and buying off and trafficking of women.Children's crime, these disputes will directly affect the conviction and sentencing, thus creating confusion or obstacles in the application of norms for the practical purpose of establishing the crime.Therefore, the accurate elaboration and induction of the characteristics of state crime is helpful to the qualitative and classification of related crimes, so as to effectively guide the judicial practice of conviction and sentencing.Accordingly, this article will be divided into the following parts to discuss:The first part mainly expounds the theoretical dimension of state crime.It includes a comment on whether state crime is an independent form of crime, how to redefine the concept of state crime and the orientation of state crime in the theoretical system of criminal law.First of all, we must affirm that state crime is an independent form of crime, then analyze the internal structure of state crime, and draw the conclusion that state crime should be positioned in the field of crime number form theory, so as to form a new understanding of the concept of state crime.The basic characteristics of state crime are expounded.The second part mainly introduces the relation between the state crime and the number form theory.Since the state crime should be positioned in the category of number form of crime, it is necessary to clarify the internal relationship between the two.First of all, it discusses what crime number type state crime belongs to, expounds that state crime belongs to a typical crime type from the angle of crime number theory, and then makes a careful distinction between state crime and continuing crime, that is, adult crime.In order to achieve the purpose of accurate identification of state crime.The third part is about the state crime and the afterwards behavior theory elaboration.The relationship between the theory of posteriori behavior and the theory of state crime is expounded in detail. The theory of state crime and the theory of posteriori behavior has a great agreement, especially the theory of joint punishment of afterwards behavior can be said to belong to the theory of state crime.In practice, the treatment of state crime is basically solved by applying the theory of post-action of co-punishment, and then the relationship between the punishable afterwards behavior and state crime is clarified.The fourth part is the identification of the related charges of state crime.In the theory of criminal law, there are a lot of controversies about which crimes belong to state crime or not.The first is to expound the typical types of state crimes, including theft, embezzlement, and so on. Secondly, there are several controversial crimes, such as kidnapping, child abduction, bigamy, trafficking in women, children's crimes, and buying and buying of trafficked women.A child crime, etc.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】