入户抢劫的理解与适用
发布时间:2018-04-05 03:34
本文选题:入户抢劫 切入点:保护法益 出处:《华侨大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:“入户抢劫”作为普通抢劫罪的加重犯予以重处,就决定了对“入户抢劫”进行理解与适用时要紧紧围绕“入户抢劫”所保护的法益,秉承刑法的罪责刑相适应原则与谦抑精神。“入户抢劫”的保护法益是公民的住宅安全,包括财产、人身、住宅安宁以及人们对住宅安全的信赖等权利。界定“户”之合理标准:从封闭性和排他性两个角度详细阐述了“户”的场所性特征;并从生活性、家庭性及供他人居住等方面深度剖析了“户”的功能性特征。抢劫行为必须要发生在户内,但是要注意暴力行为的持续状态,取财行为是否发生在户内,不影响“入户抢劫”的认定。“入户抢劫”要求行为人知道或推定知道自己是在他人住宅内实施抢劫犯罪;“入户抢劫”犯罪的抢劫故意不一定形成于入户前,,在户抢劫也属于“入户抢劫”。转化型“入户抢劫”的先行行为包括入户诈骗、入户抢夺,并不必然要求先行行为构成犯罪;转化型“入户抢劫”的场所限制是针对暴力行为或以暴力相威胁行为而言,并不是用于限制整个犯罪过程的。
[Abstract]:As the aggravated crime of ordinary robbery, "robbery into the house" should be dealt with seriously, which determines that the understanding and application of "robbery into the house" should closely revolve around the legal interests protected by "robbery into the house".Adhering to the criminal law of the principle of crime and punishment to adapt to the spirit of modesty.The protection law of "robbery into the house" is the right of citizen's residence safety, including property, person, house peace and people's trust in residence safety and so on.Defining the reasonable standard of "household": from the two angles of closure and exclusiveness, this paper expounds in detail the place characteristics of "household", and deeply analyzes the functional characteristics of "household" from the aspects of living, family and providing other people's residence.Robbery must take place in the household, but attention should be paid to the continuous state of violence and whether the act of taking money occurs in the household, which does not affect the identification of "robbery into the house"."robbery into the house" requires the perpetrator to know or presume to know that he is committing the crime of robbery in the house of another person; the robbery of the crime of "robbery into the house" is not necessarily formed before entering the house, and the robbery in the house also belongs to "robbery in the house".The leading behavior of transformed "robbery into the house" includes fraud and snatching, which does not necessarily require that the first act constitute a crime; the restriction of the place of the transformed "house robbery" is directed against the violent act or the threat of violence.Is not used to limit the whole process of crime.
【学位授予单位】:华侨大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 肖中华;论抢劫罪适用中的几个问题[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1998年05期
2 曾传红;论刑法中“入户抢劫”的认定[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报.社会公共安全研究;2002年01期
3 龚培华,张菁;“抢劫犯罪法律适用疑难问题”研讨会综述[J];法学;2005年08期
4 项谷,曹坚;抢劫罪的情节加重犯若干问题探讨[J];华东政法学院学报;2001年04期
5 刘鸿,熊永明;论非法侵入住宅罪的对象及亲告问题[J];南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版);2002年04期
6 张新江;对“入户抢劫”立法的修改建议[J];人民检察;2000年01期
7 周振想,林维;抢劫罪特别类型研究[J];人民检察;1999年01期
8 刘明祥;事后抢劫问题比较研究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2001年03期
9 项谷;华肖;张菁;;入户抢劫司法认定若干问题研究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2005年02期
10 黄祥青;;论抢劫罪情节加重犯的认定思路与方法[J];政治与法律;2005年06期
本文编号:1713032
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1713032.html