聚众斗殴罪的转化问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-10 01:11

本文选题：聚众斗殴转化定罪　切入点：主体范围　出处：《沈阳师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：当今社会，市场经济高度发展，聚众斗殴罪的常见性以及多发性，使其具有严重的社会危害性。不仅严重扰乱了社会公共秩序，同时也影响了我国社会的稳定发展。如果不有效、及时地加以制止，那么这些犯罪活动极有可能演变为“黑社会性质组织”等。聚众斗殴罪的司法认定在当今我国司法界争议较大，同时在实践中，案情相似但判决结果大相径庭的情况也很普遍。 1979年刑法第160条中有规定：“聚众斗殴、寻衅滋事、侮辱妇女或进行其他流氓活动，破坏公共秩序，情节恶劣的，处七年以下有期徒刑、拘役或管制。流氓集团的首要分子，处七年以上有期徒刑。”不难发现，聚众斗殴罪正是从该条规定的“流氓罪”中分解出来的一个全新的罪名。1979年刑法废除了流氓罪，并合理地分解为了“强制猥亵、侮辱妇女罪”、“聚众斗殴罪”、“寻衅滋事罪”以及“聚众淫乱罪”。本文拟运用刑法理论如共同犯罪等，通过对典型相关案例的分析，对聚众斗殴罪转化定罪的主观罪过认定、首要分子和积极参加者的转化及对于相对刑事责任年龄人聚众斗殴致人重伤、死亡的定罪量刑等问题作探讨。通过对聚众斗殴罪转化定罪的典型案例入手，可以较为深入地展开对于聚众斗殴罪的转化及定罪的论述，同时通过对主、客观条件的分析并结合“主客观原则”的边界划定，得出对聚众斗殴罪不能简单地以客观结果归罪，也应考虑主观故意的变化，两方面结合更能对聚众斗殴罪的转化定罪有一个明晰的认识这一结论。对于责任主体转化的讨论也是学术界普遍存在的争议，能够查清直接致害人、无法查清直接致害人以及符合共同犯罪构成要件的共同行为人这三种情况下分析责任主体的转化即具有至关重要的作用。“全案与部分转化说”这一学理上普遍存在的争议，对于进一步探讨研究转化主体范围问题具有指导性的意义。此外，近年来未成年人聚众斗殴致人重伤、死亡的案例也层出不穷，对于相对刑事责任年龄人聚众斗殴罪的转化及定罪、认定标准也值得我们深思。鉴于此，，本文拟通过案例分析的方法，对聚众斗殴罪的转化及定罪进行分析和探讨。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the high development of market economy, the crime of affray is common and frequent, which makes it have serious social harmfulness.Not only seriously disturbed the public order, but also affected the stable development of our society.If it is not effective and can be stopped in time, then these criminal activities are likely to evolve into "triad organizations" and so on.Article 160 of the Criminal Code of 1979 provides that: "gathering people to fight, provoke trouble, insult women or engage in other rogue activities, and undermine public order, if the circumstances are abominable, shall be sentenced to imprisonment of not more than seven years, criminal detention or public surveillance."Ringleaders of rogue groups are to be sentenced to not less than seven years in prison. "It is not difficult to find that the crime of affray is a completely new crime which is decomposed from the "hooliganism" as stipulated in this article. In 1979, the criminal law abolished the crime of hooliganism and reasonably broke it down into the crime of "forcible indecency, insulting women" and "the crime of affray among the masses."The crime of causing trouble and causing trouble and the crime of gathering a crowd for obscenity.This article intends to use the criminal law theory such as joint crime, through the analysis of typical relevant cases, the crime of affray into the conviction of subjective guilt,The transformation of ringleaders and active participants as well as the problems of serious injury caused by affray and conviction and sentencing of death by people of relative age of criminal responsibility are discussed.By analyzing the typical cases of the crime of affray and conviction, we can deeply discuss the transformation and conviction of the crime of affray, at the same time, by analyzing the subjective and objective conditions and combining the boundary of "subjective and objective principle", we can delimit the boundary.It comes to the conclusion that the crime of affray can not simply be imputed with objective results, but also the change of subjective intention should be considered, and the combination of two aspects can make a clear understanding of the transformation and conviction of the crime of affray.The discussion on the transformation of the subject of responsibility is also a common controversy in academic circles, which can identify the direct perpetrators.It is very important to analyze the transformation of the subject of responsibility under the three circumstances that the direct victimizer and the co-perpetrator who accord with the constituent elements of the joint crime can not be found out.The theory of "whole case and partial transformation" is a common controversy, which is of guiding significance for further study on the scope of the subject of transformation.In addition, in recent years, minor affray caused serious injuries, death cases also emerge one after another, the relative age of criminal responsibility for the transformation of the crime of affray and conviction, the standard is worth our reflection.In view of this, this paper analyzes and discusses the transformation and conviction of the crime of affray through the method of case analysis.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】