非暴力威胁类维权行为的刑事定性

发布时间：2018-04-13 06:26

本文选题：维权 + 非暴力威胁　；参考：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：当下,随着市场经济的发展、服务领域的延伸和公民维权意识的增强,维权行为引发的案件数量呈逐年上升趋势。在维权的过程中,造成严重后果的非暴力威胁维权行为多被纳入敲诈勒索罪的范畴,这是司法实践的惯常做法。在理论界对此类非暴力威胁维权行为,存在三种学说：有罪说、无罪说和待定说。针对以上情形,本文从四个司法案例入手,分析非暴力威胁维权行为与敲诈勒索之间的区分焦点,进而阐述如何对非暴力威胁类维权行为进行评价分析,并借此推出对此类维权行为的评价方法,以达到敲诈勒索罪不被滥用的目的。本文共有四章。第一章为非暴力威胁类维权行为的司法认定现状。此章共有两节内容：第一节列举了三种典型案例,分别为上访维权、消费维权、劳资维权；第二节的内容为对第一节列举的三个案例进行分析,进而简单阐述非暴力威胁维权行为与敲诈勒索其他的争议点。第二章为理论界对非暴力维权行为的研究现状。此章共有三节内容。第一节主要阐述对非暴力威胁维权行为刑事定性的必要性；第二节阐述非暴力维权行为的罪与非罪；第三节论述非暴力威胁维权与敲诈勒索界限划分的现有方式。第三章为非暴力威胁类行为的法律依据探讨。法律依据的探讨主要集中在维权行为权利来源的法律依据以及维权金额依据。第四章的内容论述非暴力维权行为与敲诈勒索罪行为的界限。本章分为三个小节。第一节从第一章列举的几个司法案例出发,阐述维权行为应注意的几个范围界限：事实根据、维权主体、维权手段、维权行为对象、赔偿要求。第二节阐述如何合理评价维权行为,并提出评价维权行为界定的流程图。第三节通过第二节提出的流程图分析文章第一章的经典案例。
[Abstract]:At present, with the development of market economy, the extension of service field and the strengthening of citizens' awareness of safeguarding rights, the number of cases caused by rights safeguarding behavior is increasing year by year.In the process of safeguarding rights, the non-violent threat of safeguarding rights, which results in serious consequences, is often included in the category of extortion, which is the usual practice in judicial practice.There are three theories about such non-violent threats in theory: guilt, innocence and pending.In view of the above situation, this paper starts with four judicial cases, analyzes the focus of the distinction between non-violent threat and extortion, and then expounds how to evaluate and analyze the non-violent threat.In order to achieve the purpose that the crime of extortion is not abused, the evaluation method of this kind of behavior is put forward.There are four chapters in this paper.The first chapter is the status quo of judicial cognizance of non-violent threats.This chapter has two sections: the first section lists three typical cases, which are petition rights, consumer rights, labor rights; the second section is the analysis of the three cases listed in the first section.Furthermore, it briefly expounds the other controversial points of non-violent threat and extortion.The second chapter is the current situation of theoretical research on non-violent rights-safeguarding behavior.This chapter consists of three sections.The first section mainly expounds the necessity of the criminal characterization of non-violent threat to protect human rights; the second section expounds the crime and non-crime of non-violent rights safeguarding; the third section discusses the existing ways of dividing the boundary between non-violent threat and extortion.The third chapter discusses the legal basis of non-violent threat-type behavior.The discussion of the legal basis mainly focuses on the legal basis of the right source and the value of the rights.The fourth chapter discusses the boundary between non-violence and extortion.This chapter is divided into three sections.The first section starts from several judicial cases listed in the first chapter, and expounds the limits of several areas that should be paid attention to in the act of safeguarding rights: the basis of facts, the main body of safeguarding rights, the means of safeguarding rights, the object of safeguarding rights and the claim for compensation.The second section expounds how to evaluate the behavior of safeguarding rights reasonably, and puts forward the flowchart of defining the behavior of evaluating the rights of rights.The third section analyzes the classic cases in the first chapter through the flow chart proposed in the second section.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】