“激愤杀人”的刑事立法初探

发布时间：2018-04-14 19:11

本文选题：激情杀人 + 激愤杀人　；参考：《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年S1期

【摘要】："激愤杀人"在故意杀人案件中已经占据较大的比重,但我国目前对其并无法律的直接规定,也未将其作为故意杀人罪的法定从宽情节,导致司法实践中的裁量标准不一。在刑法中明文规定"激愤杀人"行为具有必要性和可行性。只有符合无事先预谋性、被害人过错性和行为的当场性三个成立要件的故意杀人行为才能被认定为"激愤杀人"。在定罪方式上,采取"条文+司法解释"的方式是比较妥当的。在刑罚配置上,要注意考察域外立法以及我国关于直接侵犯公民生命权的刑罚配置体系。
[Abstract]:"indignant homicide" has already occupied a large proportion in intentional homicide cases, but there is no direct legal regulation on it in our country at present, and it is not regarded as the legal leniency of intentional homicide, which leads to different discretion standards in judicial practice.It is necessary and feasible to explicitly stipulate "indignant murder" in criminal law.Only if there is no premeditated, the fault of the victim and the act on the spot can be regarded as "indignant homicide".In the way of conviction, it is more appropriate to adopt the method of judicial interpretation.In penalty allocation, we should pay attention to the extraterritorial legislation and the penalty allocation system of direct violation of citizens' right to life.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学法律学院;
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】