当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

论刑法中的驱逐出境

发布时间:2018-04-15 17:35

  本文选题:驱逐出境 + 刑法规制 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:刑法中的驱逐出境是指将犯罪的外国人强行逐出我国领土之外的刑罚方式。驱逐含有强制之意,,“境”在刑法语境中被理解为我国大陆边境较为合适。驱逐出境的本质在于剥夺外国人在我国的居留权。刑法中的驱逐出境与行政法中的驱逐出境容易混淆,但存在法律依据、适用范围、适用理由、决定主体、适用程序、法律救济六个方面的差异。驱逐出境在我国刑罚体系中既是一种附加刑,也是一种资格刑。 我国《刑法》第35条规定:“对于犯罪的外国人,可以独立适用或者附加适用驱逐出境。”除此之外,我国没有其他相关的法律法规和司法解释对驱逐出境刑罚措施作出具体、细致的规定。法律条文简单粗疏,经总结归纳,刑法中驱逐出境制度在设置上存在以下不足:在实体上,适用对象不明确、适用范围模糊、适用条件不确定、人权保护不足;在程序上,未规定适用期限、执行程序模糊、执行时限不确定、救济保障不到位。 针对这些不足,应该从以下方面对刑法中的驱逐出境制度进行完善:在实体上,明确其适用对象、划分其适用范围、确定其适用方式、完善人权保护内容;在程序上,规定其适用期限、明确具体执行过程、确定执行时限、增设救济保障措施。以期刑法中的驱逐出境制度在司法实践中更加具有可操作性,更好地服务于社会管理工作。
[Abstract]:The expulsion from the criminal law refers to the penalty of forcible expulsion of the foreigner from the territory of our country.Expulsion means compulsion, and "boundary" is understood as the mainland border in the context of criminal law.The essence of expulsion is to deprive foreigners of their right of abode in our country.Expulsion in criminal law is easily confused with expulsion in administrative law, but there are six differences in legal basis, scope of application, reasons for application, subject of decision, procedure of application and legal remedy.Deportation is not only a supplementary penalty but also a qualification penalty in the penalty system of our country.Article 35 of the Criminal Law of our country stipulates that "expulsion from the country may be applied independently or in addition to an alien who commits a crime."In addition, China does not have other relevant laws and regulations and judicial interpretation of deportation penalty measures made specific, detailed provisions.The legal provisions are simple and careless. After summing up and summing up, the expulsion system in the criminal law has the following shortcomings: in the entity, the object of application is not clear, the scope of application is vague, the applicable conditions are uncertain, the human rights protection is insufficient; in the procedure,No applicable time limit, vague execution procedure, uncertain execution time limit and inadequate relief guarantee.In view of these shortcomings, we should perfect the expulsion system in the criminal law from the following aspects: in the entity, clear its applicable object, divide its applicable scope, determine its application mode, perfect the content of human rights protection, in the procedure,Define the time limit of its application, define the concrete execution process, determine the time limit of execution, and add relief measures.It is expected that the expulsion system in criminal law is more operable in judicial practice and serves the social management better.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.12

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 李好好;;被驱逐者的人权保护问题研究——以“关于保护被驱逐者人权的修订条款草案”为视角[J];安阳工学院学报;2012年01期

2 刘杰伟;对巴基斯坦人纳扎尔七次非法入境的思考[J];公安大学学报;2002年02期

3 刘杰伟;从纳扎尔七次非法入境引发的思考[J];北京人民警察学院学报;2001年04期

4 方波;;对外国被告人处以非监禁刑问题探讨[J];山东审判;2013年02期

5 赵春玮;朱斌斌;;行政性驱逐出境制度研究[J];中国青年政治学院学报;2010年04期

6 徐翠萍;涉外刑事审判原则及程序初探[J];刑侦研究;1999年05期



本文编号:1755105

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1755105.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e89d1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com