论绑架罪绝对确定法定刑的适用

发布时间：2018-04-16 22:14

本文选题：绑架罪 + 绝对确定法定刑　；参考：《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2015年04期

【摘要】：绑架罪法定刑的特殊性,需要在解释学上对之予以适度的限缩。在绑架过程中杀害被绑架人,应当认定为致使被绑架人死亡。在被绑架人死亡伴有轻微暴力的场合,需要区别死亡结果是否为暴力行为所致来具体判断。绑架手段之外的行为导致行为人死亡的,不能认定为致使被绑架人死亡。在故意内容不一致的共同犯罪中,构成其他罪名的共犯行为导致被绑架人死亡的,应当认定为致使被绑架人死亡。致使被绑架人死亡的罪过应仅限于故意。杀害被绑架人,只能是非法控制行为人之后的行为。勒索财物是否得逞不影响行为的定性;对绑架杀人未遂的,需要结合故意杀人未遂的司法认定体系性地理解。
[Abstract]:The particularity of the legal punishment of kidnapping crime needs to be appropriately limited in hermeneutics.Killing the kidnapped person in the course of kidnapping shall be regarded as causing the death of the kidnapped person.In cases where the kidnapped person dies with slight violence, it is necessary to distinguish whether the death result is caused by violence.If an act other than the means of kidnapping results in the death of the perpetrator, it cannot be regarded as causing the death of the kidnapped person.In the joint crime of intentional inconsistency, if the accomplice that constitutes other crimes results in the death of the kidnapped person, it shall be regarded as causing the death of the kidnapped person.The crime of killing a kidnapped person should be confined to intent only.Killing a kidnapped person can only be the act of illegally controlling the perpetrator.Whether the extortion is successful or not does not affect the characterization of the behavior; the attempted kidnapping and murder should be understood systematically in combination with the judicial cognizance of attempted intentional homicide.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学基地重点项目“香港特别行政区司法权及终审权问题研究”(12JJD810008) 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(KYZZ_0197)
【分类号】：D924.34

【参考文献】