论TRIPS的知识产权刑事救济措施及其发展

发布时间：2018-04-17 04:03

本文选题：TRIPS + 知识产权　；参考：《浙江工商大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：知识产权的刑事救济措施是TRIPS知识产权制度的重要内容。根据TRIPS第61条的规定,其内容主要涉及知识产权刑事救济措施的适用范围、知识产权侵权行为的入罪标准、知识产权犯罪行为的适用刑罚以及知识产权刑事救济措施的限制与例外。TRIPS知识产权刑事救济措施的确立与实施,不仅极大地推动了知识产权刑法保护的国际协调,而且为后TRIPS时代知识产权刑事救济制度的发展奠定了基础。本文采用文本解读、比较分析、案例研究等方法,从以下四个方面系统探讨了 TRIPS的知识产权刑事救济措施及其发展:(1)知识产权刑事救济措施的适用范围;(2)知识产权侵权行为的入罪标准;(3)知识产权犯罪行为的适用刑罚;(4)知识产权刑事救济措施的限制与例外。通过研究,本文得出如下结论:第一,将知识产权刑事救济措施这一原本属于国内法管辖的事项,纳入TRIPS的规制范围,使之成为知识产权刑法保护的国际标准,这是WTO的创举。第二,WTO成员依其宪法、法律和法规使TRIPS确立的知识产权刑事救济措施得到有效实施,是WTO成员必须履行的国际义务。对这种国际义务的履行,不仅提高了各WTO成员知识产权保护的水平,而且缩小了 WTO成员之间知识产权刑法保护水平的差异。第三,TRIPS确立的知识产权刑事救济措施只是知识产权刑法保护的最低标准,各WTO成员有权在此基础上,通过国内法或彼此之间签订的协定,对知识产权提供高于这一标准的刑法保护。缘此,WTO成员在后TRIPS时代不仅有效实施了 TRIPS的知识产权刑事救济措施,而且通过国内立法或彼此之间的协定进一步发展了 TRIPS的知识产权刑事救济措施,从而提高了知识产权的刑法保护水平。
[Abstract]:The criminal remedy of intellectual property right is an important content of TRIPS intellectual property system.According to Article 61 of TRIPS, its content mainly involves the scope of application of criminal remedy measures of intellectual property, the standard of incrimination of infringement of intellectual property.The applicable penalty of criminal acts of intellectual property and the limitation and exception of criminal remedy measures of intellectual property. The establishment and implementation of criminal relief measures for intellectual property not only greatly promote the international coordination of criminal law protection of intellectual property.Moreover, it lays a foundation for the development of the criminal remedy system of intellectual property in the post-TRIPS era.This paper adopts the methods of text interpretation, comparative analysis, case study, etc.This paper systematically discusses the criminal remedy measures of intellectual property of TRIPS and its development from the following four aspects: (1) the scope of application of criminal remedy measures for intellectual property rights and (2) the standard of incrimination of intellectual property infringement (3) the appropriateness of criminal acts of intellectual property rights.The limitation and exception of criminal remedy measures of intellectual property.Through the research, this paper draws the following conclusions: first, the criminal relief measures of intellectual property rights, which originally belong to the domestic law, are brought into the scope of TRIPS to make it the international standard for the criminal protection of intellectual property rights, which is the pioneering work of WTO.The second is that WTO members must carry out the criminal remedy measures of intellectual property established by TRIPS according to their constitution, laws and regulations.The implementation of this international obligation not only improves the level of intellectual property protection of WTO members, but also reduces the difference between WTO members' criminal law protection level of intellectual property rights.The criminal remedies for intellectual property established by trips are only the minimum standards for the criminal protection of intellectual property rights, on which the members of the WTO have the right to adopt domestic laws or agreements signed between them.The protection of intellectual property rights above this standard is provided by criminal law.Therefore, in the post-WTO era, TRIPS members not only effectively implemented the criminal relief measures of intellectual property rights of TRIPS, but also further developed the criminal relief measures of intellectual property rights of TRIPS through domestic legislation or agreements between them.Thus improving the level of criminal law protection of intellectual property rights.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】