当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

侵犯公民个人信息罪司法疑难问题研究

发布时间:2018-04-17 09:24

  本文选题:公民个人信息 + 违反国家有关规定 ; 参考:《上海师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:公民个人信息在社会不断发展中,凸显出了巨大的经济价值。随着科技的进步,收集、获取公民个人信息变的越来越容易,公民个人信息遭受严重侵害的事件时有发生,公民个人信息的刑法保护具有重要价值。2015年11月生效的《刑法修正案(九)》对侵犯公民个人信息罪做出了重大修改,这次修改具有重大意义,它加大了公民个人信息的刑法保护力度,但是,其在适用中仍然存在:以其他方法非法窃取个人信息行为的界定、“情节严重”认定、跨法犯的处理等问题。本文以《刑法修正案(九)》侵犯公民个人信息罪的重大修改为背景,提出本罪的司法疑难问题,并分析这些疑难问题的解决方案,以期能够更好的实现公民个人信息的刑法保护效果。本文除序言外,共有六个部分。第一部分,个人信息法律保护概论。首先,描述了公民个人信息受到侵害的严重现象;其次,分析了我国宪法、行政法、民法对公民个人信息的保护及不足;然后,分析了刑法保护公民个人信息的必要性,在分析刑法保护个人信息必要性的基础上,提出刑法保护公民个人信息的适度性;最后,对《刑法修正案(九)》实施后侵犯公民个人信息罪刑法保护规定进行了分析,接着分析了本罪《刑法修正案(九)》修正的进步之处。第二部分,个人信息的内涵界定问题。首先,提出了公民个人信息内涵理解两方面的问题:一是“公民”的界定问题,二是“个人信息“的界定问题;其次,通过比较分析,归纳出公民个人信息的内涵;然后,分析了公民个人信息的法律属性,对与公民个人信息相关概念进行厘清;最后,分析了公民个人信息的刑法认定路径和方法。第三部分,“违反国家有关规定”的理解问题。首先,是对“违反国家有关规定”理解争议的提出,其次,对“违反国家有关规定”争议观点进行分析;然后,分析“违反国家有关规定”的应有内涵,并分析了本罪的违法性认识问题。第四部分,对本罪行为方式认定问题。首先,分别分析了对出售、提供、窃取、以其他方法非法获取公民个人信息的行为;其次,分析了本罪的行为竞合问题;最后,分析了本罪既未遂及共犯问题。第五部分,对本罪“情节严重”认定标准的分析。首先,提出本罪“情节严重”认定标准的理解争议;其次,分析本罪“情节严重”认定的观点;最后,是对本罪“情节严重”标准具体设置的分析,通过案例分析能够更加直观的分析本罪的司法适用,本部分也结合典型案例,分析“情节严重”的认定。第六部分,跨法犯处理问题。首先,是本罪跨法犯问题的提出;其次,对本罪的跨法犯处理问题进行了分类分析;最后,是本罪跨法犯问题的解决,作者赞同以行为时法律以及一般人对当时情形的理解来对跨法犯进行认定。
[Abstract]:Personal information of citizens in the continuous development of society, highlighted the enormous economic value.With the progress of science and technology, it is becoming easier and easier to collect and obtain personal information of citizens, and incidents of serious violations of personal information of citizens occur from time to time.The criminal law protection of citizens' personal information is of great value. The Criminal Law Amendment (9), which came into effect in November 2015, has made major changes to the crime of infringing on citizens' personal information, and this revision is of great significance.It strengthens the criminal law protection of citizens' personal information, but it still exists in its application: the definition of illegal theft of personal information by other methods, the determination of "serious circumstances", and the handling of crimes committed across laws and so on.Based on the major revision of the crime of infringing on citizens' personal information, this paper puts forward the judicial difficult problems of this crime, and analyzes the solutions to these difficult problems.In order to achieve better personal information of citizens of the criminal law protection effect.Besides the preface, there are six parts in this paper.The first part is an introduction to the legal protection of personal information.Firstly, it describes the serious phenomenon of citizen's personal information being violated; secondly, it analyzes the protection and insufficiency of citizen's personal information in our constitution, administrative law and civil law; then, it analyzes the necessity of criminal law to protect citizen's personal information.On the basis of analyzing the necessity of criminal law to protect personal information, this paper puts forward the appropriateness of criminal law to protect citizen's personal information, and finally, analyzes the criminal law protection provisions for infringing on citizen's personal information after the implementation of "Criminal Law Amendment (9)".Then it analyzes the progress of the amendment of criminal law (9).The second part is about the definition of personal information.First of all, it puts forward two problems of understanding the connotation of citizen's personal information: one is the definition of "citizen", the other is the definition of "personal information"; secondly, the connotation of citizen's personal information is summed up through comparative analysis; then,This paper analyzes the legal attributes of citizen's personal information and clarifies the concepts related to citizen's personal information. Finally, it analyzes the path and method of criminal law recognition of citizen's personal information.The third part is about the understanding of the violation of the relevant regulations of the state.First, to put forward the dispute of "violating the relevant regulations of the State"; secondly, to analyze the controversial point of view of "violating the relevant provisions of the State"; and then, to analyze the proper connotation of "violating the relevant provisions of the State."And analyzes the illegal understanding of this crime.The fourth part, to this crime behavior way cognizance question.First of all, it analyzes the behavior of illegal acquisition of personal information of citizens by selling, providing, stealing and obtaining personal information by other methods; secondly, it analyzes the behavior concurrence of this crime; finally, it analyzes the problem of attempted and accomplice of this crime.The fifth part, the analysis of the crime "serious circumstances" standard.First of all, it puts forward the understanding and controversy of the criterion of "serious circumstances" of this crime; secondly, it analyzes the viewpoint of "serious circumstances" of this crime; finally, it analyzes the concrete setting of the standard of "serious circumstances" of this crime.Through the case analysis can more intuitively analyze the judicial application of this crime, this part also combines the typical cases, analyzes the "serious circumstances".The sixth part deals with the problem of cross-law offense.First of all, the problem of cross-legal crime is raised; secondly, the problem of cross-legal crime is classified and analyzed; finally, the problem of cross-legal crime is solved.The author agrees with the law of the time of the act and the understanding of the situation at that time.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.34

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 高富平;王文祥;;出售或提供公民个人信息入罪的边界——以侵犯公民个人信息罪所保护的法益为视角[J];政治与法律;2017年02期

2 劳东燕;;能动司法与功能主义的刑法解释论[J];法学家;2016年06期

3 刘越;;论生物识别信息的财产权保护[J];法商研究;2016年06期

4 鞠晔;凌学东;;大数据背景下网络消费者个人信息侵权问题及法律救济[J];河北法学;2016年11期

5 吴亚安;;论我国刑法中数额的性质[J];政治与法律;2016年09期

6 于志刚;李源粒;;大数据时代数据犯罪的类型化与制裁思路[J];政治与法律;2016年09期

7 喻海松;;网络犯罪的立法扩张与司法适用[J];法律适用;2016年09期

8 李玉萍;;侵犯公民个人信息罪的实践与思考[J];法律适用;2016年09期

9 杨惟钦;;价值维度中的个人信息权属模式考察——以利益属性分析切入[J];法学评论;2016年04期

10 陈洪兵;;刑法溯及力适用问题研究——兼与民法、行政法比较[J];法治研究;2016年04期

相关重要报纸文章 前5条

1 陈静;;给个人信息加上防护锁[N];经济日报;2016年

2 徐潇;;个人信息“裸奔” 如何击碎黑色产业链?[N];工人日报;2016年

3 张新宝;;隐私权与个人信息保护[N];法制日报;2016年

4 姜峗;;个人信息安全,不能止于“打补丁”[N];人民日报;2016年

5 陈丽平;;立法保护个人信息治理电信诈骗[N];法制日报;2016年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 刘畅;大数据时代个人信息保护问题研究[D];东北财经大学;2016年

2 张帆;我国公民个人信息保护制度法理研究[D];山西大学;2015年

3 刘倩倩;个人信息刑法保护案例研究[D];黑龙江大学;2013年



本文编号:1763010

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1763010.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7d933***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com