从盗车案谈盗窃罪中的“非法占有”目的

发布时间：2018-04-17 19:17

本文选题：非法占有目的 + 盗窃罪　；参考：《新疆大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：非法占有为目的作为大部分取得型财产犯罪、经济类犯罪中行为人所欲追求的目的，它在一定程度上有助于区分罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪，所以对这一概念的正确理解和把握是非常重要的。然而，对这一概念的认定，国内外的刑法学界存在着诸多争议。在司法实践中对非法占有目的的认定也存在着诸多困惑与分歧。本文试结合具体的案例，借鉴国内外刑法学界对这一问题的研究成果，阐述了自己对非法占有目的含义的理解，并指出了非法占有目的在立法和司法中的不足，对这一制度在立法上和司法上的完善以及认定提出了自己的看法，以期对非法占有为目的的认定有所裨益。全文共分四个部分进行论述。第一部分：从具体案例入手，简要概述了被告人盗窃车辆的行为，车辆虽然登记在被告人的名下，但因为抵债协议已经交付于原告；接着就案例定性时，控方、辩方以及法院对盗窃罪有无存在的争议和问题加以阐述，并引出了争议的焦点即“非法占有”目的的认定，为下文的展开做了铺垫；第二部分：从第一部分引出了本文要讨论的问题：盗窃罪中的“非法占有”目的。之所以出现上述争议主要在于对“非法占有”目的的认定存在分歧。该部分从比较法的角度，就刑法上的“非法占有”与相近概念：民法上的“占有”与“所有”、刑法上的“占有”与民法上的“占有”等加以比较辨析，明确了刑法上“非法占有”目的的含义，并就本文所涉案例中被告是否具有非法占有目的进行了论证；第三部分：主要从比较法的角度，就国内外关于“非法占有”目的的学说进行了归纳比较，主要包括“排除权利者意思说”、“利用处分的意思说”、“折衷说”、“不诚实永久剥夺说”以及“意图占有说”、“非法获利说”以及“意图改变所有权说”、“不法（非法）所有说”，并对各观点的优缺点加以评析，以期对刑法上的“非法占有”目的给出规范含义；第四部分:将本文所涉案例与理论相结合，从司法实践的角度，阐述了非法占有目的在立法和司法中存在的问题，及其对盗窃罪等取得型财产犯罪认定的影响，并对“非法占有”目的在立法上的界定与司法上认定提出了自己的看法，进而结合相关理论对案例进行了评析。
[Abstract]:The purpose of illegal possession, as a crime of obtaining most property, is the purpose that the perpetrator wants to pursue in the economic crime. To a certain extent, it helps to distinguish the crime from the non-crime, which is the crime and the other crime.So the correct understanding and grasp of this concept is very important.However, the definition of this concept, there are many disputes in the field of criminal law at home and abroad.In judicial practice, there are many puzzles and divergences on the purpose of illegal possession.This article tries to combine the concrete case, draws lessons from the domestic and foreign criminal law circles to this question research result, elaborated own to the illegal possession goal meaning understanding, and pointed out the illegal possession purpose in the legislation and the judicature insufficiency,The author puts forward his own views on the perfection and confirmation of this system in legislation and judicature in order to benefit the recognition of illegal possession.This paper is divided into four parts.The first part: starting from the specific case, briefly outlines the defendant's theft of the vehicle, although the vehicle is registered in the defendant's name, but because the debt settlement agreement has been delivered to the plaintiff; then, in the case of qualitative, the prosecution,The defense and the court expound the disputes and problems about the existence of the crime of larceny, and draw the focus of the dispute, that is, the purpose of "illegal possession", which paves the way for the development of the following;The second part: from the first part leads to the problem discussed in this paper: the purpose of "illegal possession" in the crime of larceny.The reason why the dispute mainly lies in the "illegal possession" of the purpose of the existence of differences.From the angle of comparative law, this part compares the concepts of "illegal possession" and "possession" in criminal law: "possession" and "possession" in civil law, "possession" in criminal law and "possession" in civil law.It clarifies the meaning of "illegal possession" in criminal law, and proves whether the defendant has the purpose of illegal possession in the case in question.The third part: mainly from the angle of comparative law, the author summarizes and compares the theories about the purpose of "illegal possession" at home and abroad, mainly including "the meaning of excluding the right", "the meaning of using punishment", "the compromise theory"."dishonest permanent deprivation" and "intention to possess", "illegal profit" and "intention to change ownership", "illegal (illegal) ownership", and to assess the merits and demerits of each point of view,With a view to the criminal law of "illegal possession" purpose to give the normative meaning;The fourth part: combine the case and theory of this article, from the angle of judicial practice, expound the problems existing in the legislation and judicature of the purpose of illegal possession, and its influence on the crime of obtaining property, such as theft, etc.The author puts forward his own views on the legislative definition and judicial confirmation of the purpose of "illegal possession", and then evaluates the case with the relevant theories.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.35

【参考文献】