论结果加重犯行为人主观罪过及其判定

发布时间：2018-04-17 21:50

本文选题：刑事法研究 + 刑罚适用　；参考：《求索》2015年05期

【摘要】：结果加重犯由基本犯和加重结果两部分构成,它是指本已符合刑法规定的某一具体的犯罪行为,由于发生了更为严重的结果,而客观上要求加重其刑的犯罪形态。对结果加重犯主观罪过之判定应涵摄对基本犯故意之判定和对加重结果过失之判定两大部分。其中,基本犯故意之判定,其核心是判定行为人之行为是否满足基本犯故意之成立的两个基本要件;对加重结果过失之判定,关键在于对行为人"能预见"能力之判定。为防范司法判断的恣意性,确保个案正义,关于结果加重犯"能预见"能力之判定,我们主张主观标准说。当然,从刑事政策的一般预防性功能出发,结果加重犯刑罚应该得到限制。从本质上看,肯定结果加重犯刑罚的法益价值与限制其法律适用之范围,乃强调归责之责任主义与注重预防之刑事政策间相互较量之结果。在当今依法治国主旋律下,如何限制结果加重犯刑罚之适用,尤其是关涉结果加重犯主观罪过认定之研究,必将呈现更注重实证、更为精细化之研究倾向。
[Abstract]:The aggravated consequential offense consists of two parts: the basic crime and the aggravating result. It refers to a specific criminal act which has already met the provisions of the criminal law. Because of the more serious result, the criminal form of aggravating its punishment is objectively required.The judgment of subjective sin of consequential aggravated offense should include two parts: intentional judgment of basic crime and judgment of aggravated consequential fault.Among them, the core of the judgment of the intention of the basic offense is to judge whether the behavior of the perpetrator satisfies the two basic elements of the establishment of the intention of the basic offense, and the judgment of the aggravated result fault lies in the judgment of the perpetrator's ability to "foresee".In order to prevent the arbitrariness of judicial judgment and ensure the justice of individual cases, we advocate the subjective criterion for judging the ability of "foreseeable" to aggravate the result of crime.Of course, from the general preventive function of criminal policy, the aggravating penalty should be restricted.In essence, affirming the value of legal interests and limiting the scope of legal application of criminal penalty is the result of the mutual contest between imputation liability doctrine and preventive criminal policy.Under the theme of governing the country according to law, how to limit the application of consequential aggravated criminal punishment, especially the research on the subjective guilt of aggravated consequential offense, will certainly present a more positive and refined research tendency.
【作者单位】：吉林大学公共卫生学院;河北民族师范学院政法系;
【基金】：吉林大学基本业务费项目“刑事法治与社会管理创新”(2012BS037)
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】