数额加重犯研究
发布时间:2018-04-18 15:00
本文选题:加重数额 + 累计计算 ; 参考:《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国刑法中的犯罪概念采用“既定性又定量”模式,《刑法》第13条是总则中定量因素的概括性规定,分则犯罪构成中定量因素则是其具体体现,数额便是分则具体犯罪构成中定量因素的表征,加重数额则是数额加重犯的定量因素。《刑法》有关数额加重犯的规定主要体现在财产、经济类犯罪中,其不仅占据一定规模,而且司法实践中也常面临相关司法适用问题,本文旨在对数额加重犯的相关问题展开研究,以期为相关犯罪的立法完善和司法适用助力。文章共约三万二千字,分以下几个部分: 第一部分首先对数额加重犯的概念进行了阐述,肯定数额加重犯概念的存在具有合理性,明确加重数额不仅仅是量刑情节,更是一种犯罪构成事实,为探讨其他相关问题奠定基础;紧接着归纳分析数额加重犯在国内外刑法中的立法体现;其次论述数额加重犯与情节加重犯、结果加重犯之间的区分,强调主要表现为加重因素的不同;最后对数额加重犯进行分类,对不同类型数额加重犯的特征和法律适用进行剖析。 第二部分在上述基础上,进一步对数额加重犯的加重因素(加重数额)进行论述。本部分首先阐述加重数额的特征;其次对数额的性质进行论述,主张数额的性质应是一种构成要件要素;最后对累计数额相关问题进行重点探讨,强调刑法规定的累计计算规则应当是一种处理罪数的特殊规则,只要规定了累计计算均可以适用,而不仅仅只是连续犯、徐行犯的情形下才适用。 第三部分通过阐述数额加重犯既遂、未遂的区分,明确数额加重犯存在既遂、未遂形态,并在此基础上讨论其具体认定,主张运用犯罪既遂标准的层次性理论来认定数额加重犯的既遂,未遂则要在主客观相统一原则下根据不同情形作出不同处理;最后探讨数额加重犯未遂的处罚问题,对“部分既遂部分未遂”情形,认为应以累计数额为前提,,区分不同情形,综合运用“整体既遂说”和“整体未遂说”,确保量刑的科学性、合理性。
[Abstract]:The concept of crime in the criminal law of our country adopts the pattern of "fixed and quantitative". Article 13 of the Criminal Law is the general stipulation of the quantitative factor in the general rule, and the quantitative factor in the constitution of the crime in the special provision is its concrete embodiment.The amount is the representation of the quantitative factor in the constitution of the specific crime, and the aggravated amount is the quantitative factor of the aggravated crime of the amount. The provisions of the Criminal Law concerning the aggravated crime of the amount are mainly embodied in the property, and in the economic crime, it not only occupies a certain scale,And the judicial practice also often faces the related judicial application problem, this article aims to carry on the research to the amount aggravated crime related question, in order to help the legislation consummation and the judicial application of the related crime.The article consists of about 32000 words, which is divided into the following parts:The first part expounds the concept of aggravated crime of amount, affirms that the existence of the concept of aggravated crime of the amount is reasonable, it is clear that the aggravated amount is not only the circumstances of sentencing, but also a fact of crime.In order to lay a foundation for the discussion of other relevant issues; then sum up and analyze the amount of aggravated crime in the criminal law at home and abroad in the legislative embodiment; secondly, discuss the amount of aggravated crime and aggravating circumstances, the distinction between the result of aggravated crime,Finally, the author classifies the amount aggravated crime, and analyzes the characteristics and the law application of the different amount aggravated crime.The second part, on the basis of the above, further discusses the aggravating factors (aggravating amount).This part first expounds the characteristics of the aggravated amount; secondly, discusses the nature of the amount, arguing that the nature of the amount should be a constituent element; finally, focuses on the issues related to the cumulative amount.It is emphasized that the accumulative calculation rule stipulated in the criminal law should be a special rule for dealing with the number of crimes, so long as the accumulative calculation can be applied, not just the continuous crime, but only in the case of Xu Xing's crime.In the third part, by expounding the distinction between accomplished crime and attempted crime, it is clear that the crime of aggravated amount exists the form of accomplished crime and attempted crime, and on the basis of this, the author discusses its specific determination.It is advocated to use the hierarchical theory of the standard of accomplished crime to determine the accomplice of aggravated crime in amount, and the attempt should be dealt with differently according to different circumstances under the principle of unity of subject and object. Finally, the problem of punishment of attempted crime of aggravated amount of crime should be discussed.In order to ensure the scientificity and rationality of sentencing, the author thinks that the cumulative amount should be taken as the premise and different situations should be distinguished, and the "whole accomplished theory" and "whole attempt theory" should be comprehensively applied to the situation of "partially accomplished part attempted".
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘明祥;论抢劫罪的加重犯[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2003年01期
2 王志祥;;数额加重犯基本问题研究[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年04期
3 王飞跃;;论一罪累计数量处罚制度的合理性[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2009年04期
4 张正新;金泽刚;;论刑法中的多次犯罪[J];湖北社会科学;2011年07期
5 刘之雄;数额犯若干问题新探[J];法商研究;2005年06期
6 王志祥;;结果加重犯的未遂问题新论[J];法商研究;2007年03期
7 杨子良;盗窃罪若干新型问题研究[J];法学杂志;2005年01期
8 赵廷光;论定罪、法定刑与量刑[J];法学评论;1995年01期
9 薛进展;论财产犯罪未遂的定罪处罚[J];法学;2003年09期
10 周光权;偷窃“天价”科研试验品行为的定性[J];法学;2004年09期
本文编号:1768861
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1768861.html