“多次索贿”犯罪情节的认知及其规范化适用——基于《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第1条的立法检视第1条

发布时间：2018-04-21 19:13

本文选题：受贿罪 + 多次索贿　；参考：《法律适用》2017年13期

【摘要】："两高"针对刑法修正案九中的"数额+情节"量刑模式进行了司法解释,在一定程度上为当前规范化办理受贿案件给出了相应指引。但是由于用语的模糊性与非明确性,也导致实践适用的无所适从、定罪量刑错乱等现象,尤其体现在"多次索贿"情节适用的次数与数额的纠缠不清、次数既未遂的模棱两可、以及次数量化标准不一致等问题。因此,唯有回归"多次索贿"情节设置的立法初衷,契合新常态下严控贪腐之风,理清此类情节适用的细化标准,进一步明确受贿案件中"多次"与其他多次情节适用之别,实现法律规范用语的稳定性与特殊情势下司法适用的协调统一。
[Abstract]:The "two High levels" have carried on the judicial explanation to the "amount plot" sentencing pattern in the ninth amendment of the Criminal Law, and to a certain extent have given the corresponding guidance for the current standardized handling of bribery cases. However, because of the ambiguity and non-clarity of the terms, it also leads to the confusion of practice, the confusion of conviction and sentencing, especially the entanglement of the number and amount of the circumstances applicable to the circumstances of "multiple requests for bribes", and the ambiguity of the number of attempts. As well as the inconsistency of quantification standard and so on. Therefore, only by returning to the legislative intention of setting up the circumstances of "multiple requests for bribes" fits in with the trend of strict control of corruption under the new normal, clarifying the detailed criteria for the application of such circumstances, and further clarifying the differences between "multiple" and other multiple circumstances in bribery cases. To achieve the stability of legal norms and the coordination of judicial application under special circumstances.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;西南政法大学青少年犯罪研究中心;
【基金】：2016年司法部重点课题“刑法立法方法研究”(16SFB1004) 2016年度重庆市教委人文社科重点项目“刑法修订中的政策导向与前置化倾向研究——以9个刑法修正案为素材的清理与反思”(16SKGH001)的部分研究成果
【分类号】：D924.392

【相似文献】