终身监禁的立法评述与司法适用问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 01:29

本文选题：终身监禁 + 刑法修正案(九)　；参考：《云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：我国刑法修正案(九)明确规定了终身监禁,但对终身监禁的看法却众说纷纭、莫衷一是。譬如认为完善无期徒刑即可达到终身监禁之效果,设立终身监禁无实际意义;终身监禁之设立,有轻纵贪污贿赂犯罪之嫌疑;加重了刑罚力度,违背刑罚发展之趋势,且不利于刑罚目的之实现。文中认为,终身监禁首先是一项不依附于任何其他刑罚的、具有独立意义的刑罚制度。且终身监禁是对当下刑事政策的回应,也是对刑事政策与刑罚原则的调和,更是刑罚制度变革的必然。同时,终身监禁体现了法律对个体生命的敬畏,是国家刑罚大权注重保护个体生命权的理性回归;是在价值选择方面对一般预防的重点关注;是刑罚在其轻刑化发展趋势下对罪责刑均衡原则的坚持;更是刑罚对正义的社会秩序的追求。在司法适用方面,犯罪人是否参与劳动因人而异、区别对待;当下不宜单独设立执行场所,但从长远来看,“小社会自治”模式应当是较为妥当的选择。
[Abstract]:The amendment of the criminal law of China (nine) clearly stipulates life imprisonment, but there are different opinions on life imprisonment. For example, it is believed that life imprisonment can reach the effect of life imprisonment, and the establishment of life imprisonment has no practical significance; the establishment of life imprisonment has the suspicion of the crime of embezzlement and bribery; it aggravates the punishment and violates the penalty. The trend of penalty development is not conducive to the realization of the purpose of punishment. In the paper, life imprisonment is a penalty system that is independent of any other penalty. And life imprisonment is the response to the present criminal policy, the reconciliation of criminal policy and the principle of penalty, and the necessity of the reform of the penal system. Life imprisonment embodies the awe of the law to the individual life. It is the rational return of the state's penalty power to protect the individual's right to life; it is the focus on the general prevention in the value choice; it is the insistence on the principle of the balance of crime and punishment under the tendency of the development of its light punishment; the pursuit of the social order of justice. In the field of application, whether the perpetrator is involved in labor varies from person to person and is treated differently; it is not appropriate to set up an executive place alone at the moment, but in the long run, the model of "small social autonomy" should be a more appropriate choice.

【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;四川省社会科学院;
【分类号】：D901

【相似文献】