我国受贿罪法定刑研究
发布时间:2018-04-23 19:42
本文选题:受贿罪 + 法定刑 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:近些年,我国受贿犯罪大案、要案频发,一方面是社会体制不完善所造成,另一方面也是我国刑事立法和司法缺陷所造成。立法上体现在法定刑设计不合理,未实现刑罚个别化的要求。司法上适用标准不统一,造成同罪异罚的不合理现象。为了完善我国受贿罪法定刑设置,体现刑罚的积极意义,有必要重构受贿罪的法定刑,进而为遏制受贿犯罪的高发态势提供合理的刑罚支持。为了明确我国受贿罪法定刑设置的背景和优缺点及完善受贿罪法定刑,笔者主要从以下几个方面进行了研究、论述: 第一部分,为了探寻我国现行刑法中受贿罪的刑法理念和文化背景,笔者着重对我国古代有关受贿的刑罚制度进行研究,主要以秦汉、唐、宋和明清四个时间段为节点,,理清我国古代受贿罪刑罚的发展轨迹,并分析其中体现的刑事政策。 第二部分,为了找出我国受贿罪法定刑中存在的问题与不足,借鉴大陆法系和英美法系先进的立法理念以及司法理念,笔者在第二部分对两大法系典型国家有关受贿罪的立法原则和法定刑设置进行分析,进而为我国受贿罪法定刑改革找到突破点。 第三部分,笔者主要通过中国古代与国外有关受贿罪法定刑的对比和实务案例的分析,对我国受贿罪法定刑中的死刑、无期徒刑、有期徒刑、附加刑设置依据以及数额在定罪量刑中的作用进行了阐述,并进一步指出了该罪法定刑在立法上的不足,并通过刑事政策对受贿法定刑设置的内在要求,为我国受贿罪法定刑设置的完善找到需要改进之处。 第四部分中,笔者在总结国内外经验的基础上,提出了完善受贿罪法定刑的建议,建议立法区分受贿主体身份分别确定法定刑,建议废除受贿罪的死刑(包括死缓),建议设立罚金刑、提建议将受贿罪法定情节具体化等。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the major bribery cases and important cases occur frequently in our country. On the one hand, they are caused by the imperfect social system, on the other hand, they are also caused by the defects of our criminal legislation and judicature. The legislation is embodied in the unreasonable design of statutory punishment and the failure to realize the requirement of individualization of punishment. Judicial application of standards is not uniform, resulting in the same crime and different punishment unreasonable phenomenon. In order to perfect the legal punishment of bribery in our country and reflect the positive significance of punishment, it is necessary to reconstruct the statutory punishment of bribery, and then to provide reasonable penalty support for curbing the high incidence of bribery. In order to clarify the background, advantages and disadvantages of the statutory punishment of bribery crime in China and improve the statutory punishment of bribery crime, the author mainly studies from the following aspects, discusses: In the first part, in order to explore the criminal concept and cultural background of bribery in the current criminal law of our country, the author focuses on the study of the penalty system of bribery in ancient China, mainly taking the four periods of Qin and Han, Tang, Song and Ming and Qing as the nodes. This paper clarifies the development track of the crime of accepting bribes in ancient China, and analyzes the criminal policy embodied therein. In the second part, in order to find out the problems and deficiencies in the legal punishment of bribery in our country, we draw lessons from the advanced legislative and judicial concepts of the continental law system and the common law system. In the second part, the author analyzes the legislative principles and the legal penalty setting of the bribery crime in the typical countries of the two legal systems, and then finds a breakthrough point for the reform of the statutory punishment of the bribery crime in our country. In the third part, the author analyzes the death penalty, life imprisonment and fixed-term imprisonment in the legal punishment of bribery crime through the comparison of the legal punishment of bribery crime between ancient China and foreign countries and the analysis of practical cases. The basis of the additional punishment and the function of the amount in the conviction and sentencing are expounded, and the deficiency of the legislation of the statutory penalty of the crime is pointed out, and the inherent requirements of the legal penalty of bribery are also put forward through the criminal policy. For our country bribery crime legal penalty establishment consummation to find the place which needs to improve. In the fourth part, on the basis of summing up the experience at home and abroad, the author puts forward some suggestions to perfect the statutory punishment of bribery crime, and suggests that legislation should distinguish the status of the subject of bribery and determine the legal penalty respectively. It is suggested that the death penalty (including death penalty should be suspended, fine penalty should be set up, and the statutory circumstances of bribery crime should be specified).
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.392
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 严励;;广义刑事政策视角下的刑事政策横向结构分析[J];北方法学;2011年03期
2 赵秉志;陈志军;;社会危害性理论之当代中国命运[J];法学家;2011年06期
3 董邦俊,唐子艳,杨剑;我国古代贪污罪立法的考察及反思[J];湖北警官学院学报;2005年02期
4 陈谦信;;单因素·多因素·层次系统——中国犯罪原因研究层次30年之述评[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2010年02期
5 赵连稳;;中国古代刑罚的演变[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年05期
6 钊作俊;现代死刑问题研究述评[J];中国刑事法杂志;1999年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 于雪婷;受贿罪法定刑设置研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
本文编号:1793335
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1793335.html