作为义务的实质来源:规范支配论之确立与展开

发布时间：2018-04-25 22:12

本文选题：作为义务 + 规范支配　；参考：《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2015年04期

【摘要】：规范支配论以法益对支配者行为的依赖为现实基础,以社会对支配者行为的期待为规范基础,主张当存在现实的支配或者规范拟制的支配时,均可以认定存在作为义务的实质基础。规范支配论之支配囊括了支配意思、现实支配行为、支配可能性等多个层次,是一个集主观与客观、现实与可能于一身的复杂概念。更重要的是,支配概念甚至能够超越其作为行为人本身特性的地位,进入社会功能与社会评价领域,成为作为义务面向现实社会生活进行实质化运动的桥梁。支配的判断标准包括支配的可能性、相当性与优越性三要素。规范支配论作为作为义务的实质来源,除具有合理限定作为义务的范围、利于建立合理的违法性程度衡量标准、利于保证刑法独立的优越性等优点外,还具有宽泛的理论解释力,值得提倡与贯彻。
[Abstract]:The theory of normative domination is based on the reliance of legal interests on the behavior of the dominator, and on the expectation of the society on the behavior of the dominator. Can be recognized as the existence of the substantive basis of the obligation. The domination of normative domination theory includes many levels such as dominating intention, real dominating behavior, dominating possibility and so on. It is a complex concept that combines subjective and objective, reality and possibility. More importantly, the concept of domination can even transcend its status as the actor's own characteristics, enter the field of social function and social evaluation, and become a bridge for the substantive movement of the obligation to face the real social life. The judgment standard of domination includes three elements: possibility of domination, equivalence and superiority. As the essential source of the obligation, the normative domination theory has the advantages of reasonably limiting the scope of the obligation, establishing a reasonable measure of the degree of illegality and ensuring the superiority of the independence of the criminal law. Also has the broad theoretical explanation power, is worth advocating and carries out.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院;
【基金】：教育部“新世纪优秀人才”支持计划项目(NCET-10)
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】